Purpose
Children with Down syndrome (
DS
) typically have reduced visual acuity (
VA
) and accommodation lag, but it is unclear whether prescribed glasses should correct both distance
VA
(
DVA
) and near
VA
(
NVA
) due to the lack of
RCT
s. We therefore conducted a multicentre
RCT
to compare the effects of bifocals designed to correct both
DVA
and
NVA
with distance‐correcting unifocal glasses in children with
DS
.
Methods
A total of 119 children with
DS
, aged 2–16, were randomly allocated for bifocal or unifocal glasses (with full correction of refraction error in cycloplegia) in 14 Dutch hospitals and followed during 1 year.
VA
data were analysed in relation to baseline
VA
with
ancova
.
Results
Treatment groups showed no differences at baseline. Shortly after receiving new corrections (~6 weeks), uncrowded
NVA
(bifocals 0.18 ± 0.33 LogMar; unifocals 0.09 ± 0.19 LogMar) and crowded
NVA
with bifocals (bifocals 0.13 ± 0.36 LogMar; unifocals 0.08 ± 0.33 LogMar) were significantly better than at baseline, but these short‐term improvements in
NVA
were not significantly different between the two treatments (p > 0.151). The 1‐year treatment differences were as follows: significantly larger improvement for bifocals compared to unifocals in both uncrowded
NVA
(bifocals 0.23 ± 0.29 LogMar, unifocals 0.12 ± 0.30 LogMar, p = 0.045) and crowded
NVA
(bifocals 0.31 ± 0.28 LogMar; unifocals 0.16 ± 0.30 LogMar, p = 0.017). Improvements in
DVA
were comparable (bifocals 0.07 ± 0.21 LogMar, unifocals 0.08 ± 0.22 LogMar, p = 0.565). Children with poor baseline
VA
improved more. Accommodation lag stayed unchanged.
Conclusion
After one year, bifocals with full correction of ametropia led to significantly larger improvement of both uncrowded
NVA
and crowded
NVA
in children with
DS
with accommodation lag compared to unifocals.