2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct patterns of dyskinetic and dystonic features following D1 or D2 receptor stimulation in a mouse model of parkinsonism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3C). 39,46 We found that increasing SNr neuron activity in ChR2‐mice with blue laser light at 25–100 Hz significantly suppressed AIM scores (Fig. 2A; Supporting Information Video S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S3C). 39,46 We found that increasing SNr neuron activity in ChR2‐mice with blue laser light at 25–100 Hz significantly suppressed AIM scores (Fig. 2A; Supporting Information Video S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After LID testing at 40 minutes after l ‐dopa injection, we tested stepping to assess whether ChR2 stimulation altered stepping improvement by l ‐dopa. We did not score orofacial AIMs because of the inability to accurately assess them in our videos, especially in the larger open‐field arena (Supporting Information Video S1) and because changes in orofacial AIMs scores mirror limb AIMs when D1‐ or D2‐dopamine receptors are blocked during LID 39 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to consider that the strongest NBG oscillations were detected in motor regions related to forelimb movements, which are mainly engaged in fast hyperkinetic forms of dyskinetic behaviour in this animal model [36,62]. After all treatments, NBG oscillations were markedly less pronounced in motor regions controlling trunk movements, which are engaged in slow twisting movements [36,62]. Additionally, it is worth noting that treatment with the D2 receptor agonist did not induce NBG oscillations in the trunk motor area.…”
Section: Effects Of D1 and D2 Receptor Agonists On Nbg Activitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this area, the induction of NBG oscillations was considerably lower than in frontal motor cortical areas controlling forelimb movements, and this rhythm was not even detectable following D2 stimulation. It is interesting to consider that the strongest NBG oscillations were detected in motor regions related to forelimb movements, which are mainly engaged in fast hyperkinetic forms of dyskinetic behaviour in this animal model [36,62]. After all treatments, NBG oscillations were markedly less pronounced in motor regions controlling trunk movements, which are engaged in slow twisting movements [36,62].…”
Section: Effects Of D1 and D2 Receptor Agonists On Nbg Activitymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation