2018
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Representations of Magnitude and Spatial Position within Parietal Cortex during Number–Space Mapping

Abstract: Mapping numbers onto space is foundational to mathematical cognition. These cognitive operations are often conceptualized in the context of a "mental number line" and involve multiple brain regions in or near the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) that have been implicated both in numeral and spatial cognition. Here we examine possible differentiation of function within these brain areas in relating numbers to spatial positions. By isolating the planning phase of a number line task and introducing spatiotopic mapping … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(104 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we see a stronger influence of visuospatial working memory in components of mathematics with a clear visual element: understanding shape and handling data. This is also in line with evidence indicating that different brain areas are activated in tasks requiring the manipulation of number or space (Arsalidou & Taylor, 2011;Kanayet et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, we see a stronger influence of visuospatial working memory in components of mathematics with a clear visual element: understanding shape and handling data. This is also in line with evidence indicating that different brain areas are activated in tasks requiring the manipulation of number or space (Arsalidou & Taylor, 2011;Kanayet et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results thus support the existence of a dedicated coding for numerosity both in parietal and occipital regions even in case of sequential presentation of the stimuli. This corroborates evidence of a functional dissociation between magnitude and spatial coding of numerosity among the intraparietal regions ( Kanayet et al. 2018 ), showing that neither numerosity nor continuous magnitude coding can be reduced to sole spatial coding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar conclusion comes also from Knops, Dehaene, Berteletti, and Zorzi (2014) study. Recent neuroimaging studies also point to the divergence of brain underpinnings of the magnitude and spatial aspects of number representations (Fattorini, Pinto, Merola, D’Onofrio, & Doricchi, 2016; Kanayet et al., 2018). Acquisition of exact symbolic (verbal) numerical representations with explicit ordering relationships may be an important factor that remodels the process of numerical space construction, which may also project on non‐symbolic numerical processes (see Berteletti et al., 2010; Piazza et al., 2013; Sella, Lucangeli, & Zorzi, 2018; cf.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%