2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-006-9117-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct roles for the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions in the degradation and accumulation of chloroplast tufA mRNA: identification of an early intermediate in the in vivo degradation pathway

Abstract: Elongation factor Tu in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a chloroplast-encoded gene (tufA) whose 1.7-kb mRNA has a relatively short half-life. In the presence of chloramphenicol (CAP), which freezes translating chloroplast ribosomes, a 1.5-kb tufA RNA becomes prominent. Rifampicin-chase analysis indicates that the 1.5-kb RNA is a degradation intermediate, and mapping studies show that it is missing 176-180 nucleotides from the 5' end of tufA. The 5' terminus of the intermediate maps to a section of the untranslate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a marked increase of tufA RNA is already detectable after 12 h when transcription is repressed, although at this time point RpoA is only diminished 50% and Rps12 is barely affected ( Figure 5C). This suggests that TufA may act as a sensor for both transcription and translation elongation and is in agreement with earlier findings that tufA RNA levels increase upon treatment of C. reinhardtii cells with rifampicin or chloramphenicol (Zicker et al, 2007). However, the chloroplast RNAs, which are strongly upregulated after 96 h, are apparently not translated as Rps12 could not be detected and ClpP1 level was strongly reduced at these time points ( Figures 4B and 4C).…”
Section: Repression Of Chloroplast Transcription and Translation Revesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, a marked increase of tufA RNA is already detectable after 12 h when transcription is repressed, although at this time point RpoA is only diminished 50% and Rps12 is barely affected ( Figure 5C). This suggests that TufA may act as a sensor for both transcription and translation elongation and is in agreement with earlier findings that tufA RNA levels increase upon treatment of C. reinhardtii cells with rifampicin or chloramphenicol (Zicker et al, 2007). However, the chloroplast RNAs, which are strongly upregulated after 96 h, are apparently not translated as Rps12 could not be detected and ClpP1 level was strongly reduced at these time points ( Figures 4B and 4C).…”
Section: Repression Of Chloroplast Transcription and Translation Revesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The 5′ end of 23 protein-coding genes has been previously described experimentally ( 20 , 24 , 29 , 34 , 44 48 , 50 57 ). WTSS coverage decreased progressively towards these 5′ ends and rarely reached them (Figure 1A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of chloroplast transcripts are strongly influenced by appropriate endo-and exonucleolytic maturation of the 5#-and 3#-untranslated regions (UTRs; Bollenbach et al, 2004). The sequence of these regions, and that of the juxtaposed coding sequence, strongly influence appropriate mRNA folding and interaction with nucleus encoded chloroplast RNA-binding complexes that maintain the integrity of the transcript by correctly processing the 5# and 3# ends to prevent degradation by nucleases (Monde et al, 2000;Bollenbach et al, 2004;Zicker et al, 2007). As rbcL S expression in tobacco Rst is controlled by the same promoter and 5# UTR as tobacco rbcL it is likely changes to the 3# UTR and rbcL S coding sequences perturbed proper maturation and stabilization of the transcripts making them more susceptible to degradation by plastid ribonucleases.…”
Section: What Is Limiting the Content Of L S S T In Tobacco Rst Leaves?mentioning
confidence: 99%