2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08084-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct roles of temporal and frontoparietal cortex in representing actions across vision and language

Abstract: Both temporal and frontoparietal brain areas are associated with the representation of knowledge about the world, in particular about actions. However, what these brain regions represent and precisely how they differ remains unknown. Here, we reveal distinct functional profiles of lateral temporal and frontoparietal cortex using fMRI-based MVPA. Frontoparietal areas encode representations of observed actions and corresponding written sentences in an overlapping way, but these representations do not generalize … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
94
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(76 reference statements)
8
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again, this research has highlighted activity in a brain network encompassing the MTG. The involvement in processing both words and gestures is consistent with the proposal that the entire MTG functions as a multimodal interface, interposed between the inferior temporal and the superior temporal gyri, specialized to processing of pictorial and verbal material, respectively (Binder et al, 2009;Visser et al, 2012;Wurm and Caramazza, 2019). While previous studies suggest that the MTG is implicated in representing the meaning of communicative signs, it is unclear how neural information is organized; in particular, whether neural representation of meanings in the MTG is abstracted away from the input modality, or rather reflects, in some way, whether meanings are conveyed through words or gestures.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once again, this research has highlighted activity in a brain network encompassing the MTG. The involvement in processing both words and gestures is consistent with the proposal that the entire MTG functions as a multimodal interface, interposed between the inferior temporal and the superior temporal gyri, specialized to processing of pictorial and verbal material, respectively (Binder et al, 2009;Visser et al, 2012;Wurm and Caramazza, 2019). While previous studies suggest that the MTG is implicated in representing the meaning of communicative signs, it is unclear how neural information is organized; in particular, whether neural representation of meanings in the MTG is abstracted away from the input modality, or rather reflects, in some way, whether meanings are conveyed through words or gestures.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We emphasize that modality effects in the MTG reflect fine-grained distinctions underneath the general meaningful versus meaningless distinction. Primarily, the MTG responds more strongly to meaningful compared with meaningless stimuli; as such, it is a multimodal area (Binder et al, 2009;Visser et al, 2012;Wurm and Caramazza, 2019).…”
Section: Meaningful Stimuli: Pantomimes Emblems and Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) findings in neurotypical adults are consistent with the available neuropsychological data, as there is increased blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast in the left posterior middle temporal gyrus when participants gesture tool use (Brandi et al, 2014;Johnson-Frey et al, 2005;Vry et al, 2015), view images of tools (Beauchamp et al, 2002;Chao et al, 1999;Garcea et al, 2016;Mahon et al, 2007; for review, see Lingnau & Downing, 2015;A. Martin, 2007), and make judgments about actions (Kable et al, 2005;Kable et al, 2002;Wurm & Caramazza, 2019), including tool use actions (Kleineberg et al, 2018;Valyear & Culham, 2010). Furthermore, an emerging literature demonstrates there is increased functional connectivity between the left inferior parietal lobule and left posterior middle temporal gyrus when neurotypical participants gesture the use of tools (Garcea et al, 2018;Hutchison & Gallivan, 2018;Vingerhoets & Clauwaert, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…that can be used by an agent in order to reason about the possibility to act within and upon a context, in a proper and agent's consistent-with-intention way 27,28 . The action reappraisal idea appears to be supported by recent neuropsychological evidence indicating the inferior parietal cortex and the middle temporal brain areas as regions where a multimodal integration of action and semantic information takes place to generate high-level cognitive representations about tools 35,[37][38][39] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%