1992
DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(92)90005-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
145
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
28
145
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerous ERP studies have manipulated working memory load in a variety of paradigms, and these manipulations are generally associated with slow negative potentials rather than the positive potential observed here (King & Kutas, 1995;Mecklinger & Pfeifer, 1996;Mecklinger, Schriefers, Steinhauer, & Friederici, 1995;Münte, Schiltz, & Kutas, 1998;Roeder, Rösler, & Hennighausen, 1997;Ruchkin, Johnson, Grafman, Canoune, & Ritter, 1992.…”
Section: What's Special About Rule Use?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, numerous ERP studies have manipulated working memory load in a variety of paradigms, and these manipulations are generally associated with slow negative potentials rather than the positive potential observed here (King & Kutas, 1995;Mecklinger & Pfeifer, 1996;Mecklinger, Schriefers, Steinhauer, & Friederici, 1995;Münte, Schiltz, & Kutas, 1998;Roeder, Rösler, & Hennighausen, 1997;Ruchkin, Johnson, Grafman, Canoune, & Ritter, 1992.…”
Section: What's Special About Rule Use?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, this negativity shows functional and topographical similarities to other negative components that appear to be specific for working memory operations that include aspects oflanguage (Kluender & Kutas, 1993;Lang et al, 1987;Ruchkin, Johnson, Grafman, Canoune, & Ritter, 1992). For example, Ruchkin et al (1992) found the amplitude of a left frontal negativity to be correlated with working memory load during phonological memory operations. Kluender and Kutas (1993) found the amplitude of a left frontal negativity to be related to working memory load during filler gap assignment operations.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent ERP studies have shown that certain slow potentials are associated with working memory (Lang, Starr, Lang, Lindinger, & Ruchkin et al, 1994;Ruchkin, Johnson, Grafman, Canoune, & Ritter, 1992). These slow potentials were found to index working memory, not just preparatory processes (Ruchkin et al, 1995) and showed different topographies in visual compared to auditory tasks (Lang et al, 1992; Ruchkin et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These slow potentials were found to index working memory, not just preparatory processes (Ruchkin et al, 1995) and showed different topographies in visual compared to auditory tasks (Lang et al, 1992; Ruchkin et al, 1992). While several ERP studies have used delayed match to sample tasks (Lang et al, 1992; Ruchkin et al, 1992Ruchkin et al, ,1994Ruchkin et al, ,1995, there has been only one preliminary ERP study of a visuospatial DRT in humans (Rama et al, 1995). They reported increased negative slow potential activity duTing the delay interval for memory compared to control trials mama et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%