2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-023-09521-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing but not defining: How ambivalence affects contemporary identity disclosures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The twenty-first century has seen the rise of new sexual identity subcultures, the growth of which has been attributed at least in part to the emergence of social technologies which allow new sexual stories to circulate wider and impact a broader population (Hammack & Manago, 2024;Hammack & Wignall, 2023;Wignall, 2022). This rise has occurred concurrently with an expansion in sexual identity labels and a lessening attachment to lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) identity labels as core or necessarily primary elements of sexual identity (Ghaziani & Holmes, 2023;Savin-Williams, 2005). A rise in visibility of kink identities and subcultures has been part of this larger process and resulted in a flourishing of new understandings of the way in which individuals form communities to play with roles and power in both sexual and nonsexual ways (e.g., Wignall & McCormack, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twenty-first century has seen the rise of new sexual identity subcultures, the growth of which has been attributed at least in part to the emergence of social technologies which allow new sexual stories to circulate wider and impact a broader population (Hammack & Manago, 2024;Hammack & Wignall, 2023;Wignall, 2022). This rise has occurred concurrently with an expansion in sexual identity labels and a lessening attachment to lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) identity labels as core or necessarily primary elements of sexual identity (Ghaziani & Holmes, 2023;Savin-Williams, 2005). A rise in visibility of kink identities and subcultures has been part of this larger process and resulted in a flourishing of new understandings of the way in which individuals form communities to play with roles and power in both sexual and nonsexual ways (e.g., Wignall & McCormack, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, several studies identify a desire to avoid discrimination, concerns regarding acceptance, fear of rejection, anxious anticipation of stigmatic reactions, and the risk of "heterosexual hostility toward homosexuality" as motivations for being closeted (Bry et al, 2017;Feinstein et al, 2020;Jackson & Mohr, 2016;Meidlinger & Hope, 2014;Ponse, 1976, p. 315). However, recent sexuality scholarship finds that queer people feel ambivalent about identity disclosure (Ghaziani & Holmes, 2023) and, if safe, may even intervene in antagonistic reactions to educate others (Orne, 2013). Thus, preventing hostility less commonly motivates concealment for younger generations.…”
Section: The Closetmentioning
confidence: 99%