2015
DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-435-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing cirrus cloud presence in autonomous lidar measurements

Abstract: Abstract. 2012 Level-2 Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) satellite-based cloud data sets are investigated for thresholds that distinguish the presence of cirrus clouds in autonomous lidar measurements, based on temperatures, heights, optical depth and phase. A thermal threshold, proposed by Sassen and Campbell (2001) C, respectively, for tops and bases) and optical depths (1.18 vs. 1.23) reflect the sensitivity to this constraint. Over 99 % of all T top ≤ −37 • C clouds are classified … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis for applying this thermal threshold is motivated by Campbell et al (2015). Though conservative, significant ambiguity arises from interpreting autonomous lidar signals and from distinguishing ''warm cirrus'' (typically, sheared fallstreaks decoupled from their parent cloud, which give the appearance of a cirrus cloud with an apparent top height temperature warmer than 2378C) from glaciated liquid water clouds that, though ice, are not cirrus in the phenomenological sense.…”
Section: Caliop Cirrus Cloud Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis for applying this thermal threshold is motivated by Campbell et al (2015). Though conservative, significant ambiguity arises from interpreting autonomous lidar signals and from distinguishing ''warm cirrus'' (typically, sheared fallstreaks decoupled from their parent cloud, which give the appearance of a cirrus cloud with an apparent top height temperature warmer than 2378C) from glaciated liquid water clouds that, though ice, are not cirrus in the phenomenological sense.…”
Section: Caliop Cirrus Cloud Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud phase is determined using a cloud top temperature threshold suggested by Sassen and Campbell (2001) and Campbell et al (2015) in order to identify cirrus based on the ice nucleation threshold. An estimated cloud optical depth (COD) is provided for clouds identified as cirrus using the procedure described by Chew et al (2011).…”
Section: Cloud Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of horizontally oriented crystals is also detected when observing specular spots from the spotlight on the clouds (Borovoi et al, 2008); flutter width is also estimated to be 0.4 • . Lidar observations of the ice clouds provide the basic information about particle orientation Chen et al, 2002;Noel and Sassen, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%