2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing effect of buffing vs. grinding, milling and turning operations on the chloride induced SCC susceptibility of 304L austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the variation of width and thickness in the specimen's gauge section does not influence the observed high value of ultimate tensile. It is well established that during machining because of tool-material interactions, the generated surface is affected through roughness, hardness, residual stress distribution and thereby, influence the mechanical properties of the manufactured parts (Kumar et al, 2017;Ben Fredj et al, 2006;Gürbüz et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2018). H. Sutanto (2007) investigated the characteristics of residual stresses during CNC milling machining and observed that very high compressive residual stress (−375 MPa) was induced at the surface of the work material.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the variation of width and thickness in the specimen's gauge section does not influence the observed high value of ultimate tensile. It is well established that during machining because of tool-material interactions, the generated surface is affected through roughness, hardness, residual stress distribution and thereby, influence the mechanical properties of the manufactured parts (Kumar et al, 2017;Ben Fredj et al, 2006;Gürbüz et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2018). H. Sutanto (2007) investigated the characteristics of residual stresses during CNC milling machining and observed that very high compressive residual stress (−375 MPa) was induced at the surface of the work material.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В работах [19,29,33,34] было изучено влияние механической обработки нержавеющей стали на инициирование КРН при различных уровнях оста точных напряжений. Общей особенностью микро трещин является то, что направление растрескива ния перпендикулярно направлению обработки (на вертикальном фрезерном станке).…”
Section: коррозионное растрескивание под напряжениемunclassified
“…Образование микро трещин становилось значительным при достиже нии критического значения напряжений, для нер жавеющей аустенитной стали 316 оно составило 190 МПа [33]. В работах [29,34] отмечается, что операция полировки улучшила сопротивление КРН, благодаря синергии трех факторов: сжимаю щих напряжений, минимальной пластической де формации и улучшенной шероховатости поверхно сти. В работе [19] методом сканирующей электрон ной микроскопии высокого разрешения в резуль тате полировки в сплаве 600 был обнаружен тон кий слой зоны деформации (200-700 нм), состоя щий из наноразмерных рекристаллизованных зе рен.…”
Section: коррозионное растрескивание под напряжениемunclassified
“…It is reported that many factors such as microstructural features, surface roughness [10], state of stress affect initiation, development, and breakdown of passive films. Usually, stainless steels undergo certain industrial activities such as heavy machining, welding, and other deformation processes to suit industrial demands of fabrication [2,[11][12][13]. The machining process induces damage at the sub-surface and extending to the surface level [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%