2015
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.15com09859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Functional From Syndromal Recovery: Implications for Clinical Care and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of psychosocial function in patient care is highlighted by evidence that psychosocial impairments often persist after symptomatic remission [18], are associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes [1921], and remain a major concern for patients [22]. Functional recovery is distinct from symptomatic recovery and likely requires different treatment approaches [23, 24]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of psychosocial function in patient care is highlighted by evidence that psychosocial impairments often persist after symptomatic remission [18], are associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes [1921], and remain a major concern for patients [22]. Functional recovery is distinct from symptomatic recovery and likely requires different treatment approaches [23, 24]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At best, only two thirds of patients respond (show at least a 50% drop in symptoms), and only about a third remit (show a complete normalization of symptoms; Cuijpers et al, 2014; Rush, Kraemer, et al, 2006). Functional impairment often lags behind symptomatic improvements (Rush, 2015; Sheehan et al, 2011; Sheehan, Nakagome, Asami, Pappadopulos, & Boucher, 2017). Of those who no longer meet diagnostic criteria for MDD at the end of treatment, over half will relapse within 2 years even if continued on maintenance antidepressant medication (Anderson et al, 2008; Cuijpers, van Straten, Andersson, & van Oppen, 2008; Rush, Trivedi, et al, 2006; Vittengl, Clark, Dunn, & Jarrett, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full functional recovery is the ultimate goal of MDD treatment, 13,14 with functional remission being defined as SDS subscale scores ≤ 2; 19 for this particular analysis, we used a shift to mild/no impairment (≤3) as the endpoint given the low rates of functional remission at the end of an 8-week trial 23 and the de-synchronicity between symptomatic remission and functional recovery. [9][10][11] A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the optimal threshold of early improvement (percentage change from baseline in the SDS subscale score) for predicting achievement of the functional shift threshold for each respective subscale. First, changes in functioning over time were examined in patients included in the ROC analysis (patients with marked/extreme impairment (≥7) at baseline).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Functional impairment in patients with MDD seems to improve with treatment along with reduction in depressive symptoms. 7,8 However, functional recovery may lag behind symptomatic remission, [9][10][11] and residual symptoms of depression can delay full functional recovery even in patients who have achieved clinical remission. 12 Treatment goals for patients with MDD, therefore, should include both symptom remission and functional recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%