2014
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Imaging Features between Spinal Hyperplastic Hematopoietic Bone Marrow and Bone Metastasis

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Systematic investigations of the distinguishing imaging features between spinal hyperplastic hematopoietic bone marrow and bone metastasis have not been reported, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to determine the distinguishing imaging features of the 2 entities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prior studies described that red‐marrow hyperplasia, on conventional imaging, shows moderate to marked decrease in signal intensity on T 1 ‐ and T 2 ‐weighted spin‐echo images. Moreover, they showed mild‐to‐moderate increases in signal intensity on fat‐saturated T 2 ‐weighted images compared to malignancy . In contrast, our results show that the conventional imaging findings including signal intensity of the lesions on T 1 ‐ and fat‐suppressed T 2 ‐weighted images, margin, and enhancement pattern do not differ in either group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prior studies described that red‐marrow hyperplasia, on conventional imaging, shows moderate to marked decrease in signal intensity on T 1 ‐ and T 2 ‐weighted spin‐echo images. Moreover, they showed mild‐to‐moderate increases in signal intensity on fat‐saturated T 2 ‐weighted images compared to malignancy . In contrast, our results show that the conventional imaging findings including signal intensity of the lesions on T 1 ‐ and fat‐suppressed T 2 ‐weighted images, margin, and enhancement pattern do not differ in either group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, the exact diagnosis is often delayed until pathology is confirmed, or stability of the lesion is proven on follow‐up exams. In a recent study, PET‐CT demonstrated significant differences in FDG uptakes between the spinal hyperplasic hematopoietic marrow and bone metastasis . However, 5 out of 13 cases with metastasis had a similar range of maximum standardized uptake value to that of hematopoietic marrow in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of intervertebral disks or skeletal muscle signals in T1-weighted images has been internal standards in clinical practice since the initial study reported that they have helped determine pathologic marrow infiltrations with high accuracy 15 . However, the challenge for diagnosing marrow infiltrative diseases has been attributed to the presence of an overlap between normal hypercellular marrow and diffuse marrow infiltrations 16 . Moreover, a considerable proportion of multiple myeloma and the most of MGUS have been deluded as normal marrow patterns 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shigematsu et al [9] demonstrated the imaging features of bone marrow hyperplasia and bone metastasis. Their quantitative study showed that mean maximum SUV (SUV max ) for bone marrow hyperplasia was significantly lower than that for bone metastasis, and indicated that quantitative assessment using SUV max >3.6 is useful for differentiating bone marrow hyperplasia from bone metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%