2011
DOI: 10.37236/537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Maps

Abstract: The distinguishing number of a group $A$ acting faithfully on a set $X$, denoted $D(A,X)$, is the least number of colors needed to color the elements of $X$ so that no nonidentity element of $A$ preserves the coloring. Given a map $M$ (an embedding of a graph in a closed surface) with vertex set $V$ and without loops or multiples edges, let $D(M)=D({\rm Aut}(M),V)$, where ${\rm Aut(M)}$ is the automorphism group of $M$; if $M$ is orientable, define $D^+(M)$ similarly, using only orientation-preserving automor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this paper is the presentation of fundamental results for the endomorphism distinguishing number, and of open problems. In particular, we extend the Motion Lemma of Russell and Sundaram [14] to endomorphisms, present endomorphism motion conjectures that generalize the Infinite Motion Conjecture of Tom Tucker [16] and the Motion Conjecture of [4], prove the validity of special cases, and support the conjectures by examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this paper is the presentation of fundamental results for the endomorphism distinguishing number, and of open problems. In particular, we extend the Motion Lemma of Russell and Sundaram [14] to endomorphisms, present endomorphism motion conjectures that generalize the Infinite Motion Conjecture of Tom Tucker [16] and the Motion Conjecture of [4], prove the validity of special cases, and support the conjectures by examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This concept has spawned numerous papers, mostly on finite graphs. But countable infinite graphs have also been investigated with respect to the distinguishing number; see [9], [15], [16], and [17]. For graphs of higher cardinality compare [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same is true for infinite graphs whose automorphism group is finite. Tucker [15] conjectured, that an analogous result holds for locally finite graphs with infinite automorphism group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Conjecture 1 (Infinite motion conjecture [15]). Let G be a locally finite, connected graph and assume that every automorphism of G moves infinitely many vertices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For infinite graphs one of the most intriguing questions is whether or not the following conjecture of Tucker [12] is true. Conjecture 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%