2016
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Mediational Models and Analyses in Clinical Psychology: Atemporal Associations Do Not Imply Causation

Abstract: We propose a delineation of mediational effects derived from cross-sectional designs into the terms temporal and atemporal associations to emphasize time in conceptualizing process models in clinical psychology. The general implications for mediational hypotheses and the temporal frameworks from within which they may be drawn are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
127
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To complement and reinforce the direction of causality of the association between PSP and IGD, the model was repeated using the longitudinal data (Winer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To complement and reinforce the direction of causality of the association between PSP and IGD, the model was repeated using the longitudinal data (Winer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the Internet Gaming Disorder 17 longitudinal data only was based on recommendations supporting that causal associations should be best addressed longitudinally (Winer et al, 2016). More specifically, PSP at TP1 was used as the independent variable, PA (active minutes) at TP2 were used as the moderator, and IGD behaviors at TP3 were used as the outcome variable.…”
Section: Analyses and Statistical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess H 2 , a moderation analysis was conducted via Process software (Hayes 2013) to determine if the interaction between anxiety and balanced family cohesion positively moderated (buffered) IGD symptoms. The longitudinal data were used to explore this relationship following relevant literature recommendations, which suggest longitudinal data is required to support causative associations (Winer et al 2016). In accordance with these suggestions, participants' anxiety scores at T1 were entered as the independent variable, balanced family cohesion at T2 was entered as the moderator, and IGD at T3 was used as the outcome variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and includes impaired control and harmful consequences as a consequence of engaging in the behavior (APA, 2013; King et al, 2013). IGD-related behaviors can result in a wide range of negative psychosocial repercussions including sacrificing work, education, socializing, and hobbies (Griffiths, Davies, & Chappell, 2004; Rehbein, Psych, Kleimann, Mediasci, & Mößle, 2010;Yee, 2006a), increased stress (Batthyány, Müller, Benker, & Wölfling, 2009), lower psychosocial wellbeing and loneliness (Lemmens, Valkenburg, & Peter, 2011), poorer social skills (Griffiths, 2010), decreased academic achievement (Jeong & Kim, 2011; Rehbein et al, 2010), increased inattention (Faiola, Newlon, Pfaff, & Smyslova, 2013), maladaptive coping (Batthyány et al, 2009; Hussain & Griffiths, 2009a, 2009b, and auditory and visual hallucinations (Ortiz de Gortari & Griffiths, 2013, 2014, 2016. Given that IGD presents a significant potential public health risk (APA, 2013), understanding its precursors may provide information that can be used for more effective prevention and intervention policies (Kuss & Griffiths, 2012b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%