2019
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1575665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Motivational Traits between Person-Organization Fit and Person-Job Fit: Testing the Moderating Effects of Extrinsic Rewards in Enhancing Public Employee Job Satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is further explained that someone with high job satisfaction shows a positive attitude towards the job, while someone who is dissatisfied with his job shows a negative attitude towards the job. This is supported by the previous research conducted by Lim et al (2019), Peng & Mao (2014), who found that person-job fit has a positive influence on job satisfaction. From this explanation, the following hypothesis can be formulated: H2: Person-job fit has a positive influence on job satisfaction…”
Section: The Influence Of Person-job Fit On Job Satisfactionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is further explained that someone with high job satisfaction shows a positive attitude towards the job, while someone who is dissatisfied with his job shows a negative attitude towards the job. This is supported by the previous research conducted by Lim et al (2019), Peng & Mao (2014), who found that person-job fit has a positive influence on job satisfaction. From this explanation, the following hypothesis can be formulated: H2: Person-job fit has a positive influence on job satisfaction…”
Section: The Influence Of Person-job Fit On Job Satisfactionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When the employees get benefits more than their efforts, the level of satisfaction increases. Besides, when companies have fewer employees, they feed them more than limits, likewise in the Mobilink-Warid merger case, after firing many employees, the rest of the employees get more benefits and salaries than before (Lim et al, 2019). Hence, the results of hypothesis 4: stated positively with 0.244 beta, t-value 6.004, and p-value 0.000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Specifically, the pay is considered one of the key factors and individually equivalents four times compared to other compensation factors (Addis et al, 2018). Moreover, (Lim et al, 2019), also founded the positive influence of extrinsic rewards on employees' job satisfaction and person-organization fit. Therefore, we proposed the following hypothesis: H3: Overall compensation benefits have positive and statistically significant effects on employees' job satisfaction.…”
Section: Overall Compensation Benefits and Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This scale was adopted because it has been successfully used in previous studies (Pawirosumarto et al, 2017;Langer et al, 2019). Job satisfaction, assessed by 4 item scale adopted from the study of (Thatcher et al, 2002), and successfully administered in recent studies (McVeigh et al, 2019;Lim et al, 2019). Job stress was evaluated by seven items; these items were taken from the study of (Qureshi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Measurement Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%