2014 IEEE International Symposium on Bioelectronics and Bioinformatics (IEEE ISBB 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/isbb.2014.6820918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing normal and pulmonary edema chest x-ray using Gabor filter and SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach can help doctors detect the degree of infection easily and accurately. Kumar et al [103] used a machine learning algorithm to perform texture analysis of chest X-rays. They used a Gabor filter and SVM to distinguish normal chest and pulmonary edema in chest radiographs, and they obtained an AUC of 0.96.…”
Section: Specific Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can help doctors detect the degree of infection easily and accurately. Kumar et al [103] used a machine learning algorithm to perform texture analysis of chest X-rays. They used a Gabor filter and SVM to distinguish normal chest and pulmonary edema in chest radiographs, and they obtained an AUC of 0.96.…”
Section: Specific Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors then used wavelet transform for texture feature extraction. Kumar et al [10] proposed an approach which was based on machine learning algorithm. Authors used texture analysis of chest X-rays for pulmonary edema detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is proved experimentally that augmenting the original imbalanced dataset with a proposed method improves performance of chest pathology classification. It is explored that CNN based abnormality detection in frontal CXRs has found in the existing literature to be insufficient for making comparison of various detection techniques either due to studies reported on private datasets are not reporting the test scores in proper detail [9]. In order to overcome these difficulties, we have used the publicly available three CXRs datasets and studied the performance of various CNN architectures on different abnormalities.…”
Section: Validate the Model For The Optimal Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%