2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2021.101970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing reworked diatoms derived from Neogene marine strata in modern coastal assemblages for understanding taphonomic processes and reconstructing Holocene paleoenvironments in the Tokachi coastal area, Hokkaido, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the classification of diatom species, we considered factors such as salinity (ranging from marine, marine–brackish, brackish, brackish–freshwater, to freshwater) and life form (comprising planktonic, epontic, and benthic categories), drawing on ecological references [ 32 , 35 , 44 46 ]. Diatoms from the Neogene period along the Hidaka coast, as reported by Sagayama et al [ 47 ], were excluded from the assemblage analysis due to their allochthonous contribution linked to the erosion of older deposits [ 48 ]. Moreover, we exclusively included species constituting more than 3% of the total, considering them significantly present for the subsequent diatom assemblage analysis, while disregarding less common species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the classification of diatom species, we considered factors such as salinity (ranging from marine, marine–brackish, brackish, brackish–freshwater, to freshwater) and life form (comprising planktonic, epontic, and benthic categories), drawing on ecological references [ 32 , 35 , 44 46 ]. Diatoms from the Neogene period along the Hidaka coast, as reported by Sagayama et al [ 47 ], were excluded from the assemblage analysis due to their allochthonous contribution linked to the erosion of older deposits [ 48 ]. Moreover, we exclusively included species constituting more than 3% of the total, considering them significantly present for the subsequent diatom assemblage analysis, while disregarding less common species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2005) to inhabit freshwater environments, not necessarily implying the transport from a marine habitat. In addition, Delphineis sp., Palaria sulcate , Thalassionema niztschioides , and Thalassiosira lineata are found as fossil species in Neogene formations (e.g., Akiba, 1986), which may not directly suggest transport from a marine environment (Chiba et al., 2021). Because the hinterland of the study area consists of the Paleocene sedimentary rocks, it is unlikely that the rocks containing these fossil species were directly transported to the peatland.…”
Section: Description Of Tsunami Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%