2010
DOI: 10.1080/00048671003610104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Suicidal from Non-Suicidal Deliberate Self-Harm Events in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder

Abstract: In clinical situations, any Borderline Personality Disorder patient seeking help or medical attention, using any method other than superficial external injury to skin, or reporting a failure to effectively resolve the reasons for the DSH event, should be considered as likely to have had a S-DSH event (greater suicidal intention). However, specific reasons for the DSH event, or individual subject characteristics, did not meaningfully distinguish S-DSH from NS-DSH events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a key recommendation of the Royal College (Royal College of psychiatrists, 2010). The model supports recent claims that it is clinically more sensible to determine risk of suicide after any self-harm attempt by assessing the methods used rather than by asking patients the reasons for self-harming (Maddock et al, 2010). This is so since the model does not rely on subjective reports of patients in determining the severity of risks, but on a combination of objective lethality (method used and harm caused) and inimicality (situational risk factors) of a self-harm act.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a key recommendation of the Royal College (Royal College of psychiatrists, 2010). The model supports recent claims that it is clinically more sensible to determine risk of suicide after any self-harm attempt by assessing the methods used rather than by asking patients the reasons for self-harming (Maddock et al, 2010). This is so since the model does not rely on subjective reports of patients in determining the severity of risks, but on a combination of objective lethality (method used and harm caused) and inimicality (situational risk factors) of a self-harm act.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It can also be referred as the 'how likely to die' question. It is impossible to determine the intensity of someone desire without asking that person but, given the unreliability in selfreports of intention around the time of an act (Klonsky, 2007) this could be inferred objectively from the nature and severity of selfharm (Maddock, Carter, Murrell, Lewin, & Conrad, 2010). A rule of thumb is that higher the intentionality, the greater the likely lethality of a self-harm act.…”
Section: Developing An Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, those with DSH behaviors have a greater tendency toward borderline personality disorder than those without DSH behaviors [21]. Furthermore, in women with borderline personality disorder, the method of DSH can distinguish DSH and ITS [22]. Therefore, the presence of a mental health condition and particular methods of DSH can also increase the risk of DSH and ITS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, patients may have motivational reasons that are variable, multiple and often confusing to themselves (Klonsky 2007), even though the intention is the same: to self-harm. It is suggested that intention can be derived from the nature or the injury caused, for presumably that is the purpose of the act (Maddock 2010). Sometimes the act is not fully executed, when patients with suicidal urges make abortive attempts because they do not know what the lethal dose or lethal injury would be.…”
Section: Key Elements In Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%