2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing type II focal cortical dysplasias from normal cortex: A novel normative modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 MRI-negative patients represent a major diagnostic challenge. 2 Currently, benchmark automated detection methods fail in 20% to 40% of patients, [3][4][5][6] particularly those with subtle FCD, and suffer from high false-positive (FP) rates. 7 Conversely, deep neural networks outperform state-of-the-art methods at disease detection (see elsewhere 8,9 for review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 MRI-negative patients represent a major diagnostic challenge. 2 Currently, benchmark automated detection methods fail in 20% to 40% of patients, [3][4][5][6] particularly those with subtle FCD, and suffer from high false-positive (FP) rates. 7 Conversely, deep neural networks outperform state-of-the-art methods at disease detection (see elsewhere 8,9 for review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, several surface-based algorithms have been developed for fully automated detection of FCD type II [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]; the addition of FLAIR has increased sensitivity for the identification of smaller lesions [55]. Importantly, careful preprocessing, including manual corrections of tissue segmentation and surface extraction, have delivered high-fidelity FCD features [61].…”
Section: Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, suboptimal processing of surface-based data may lead to poor performance, even in cases with MRI visible lesions [62]. Admittedly, current benchmark automated detection algorithms fail in 20–40% of patients [55, 56, 59, 63], particularly those with subtle FCD type II, and suffer from relatively high false-positive rates [60]; also, the limited set of features designed by human experts may not capture the full complexity of pathology. Alternatively, in recent years, deep learning has shown high detection performance relative to conventional methods [64, 65].…”
Section: Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snyder et al implemented a new method to describe and detect FCD lesions [ 23 ]. First, they created a model based on a rotationally invariant and multi-contrast 3D local feature implementation that describes the normal variability of the cortex in healthy subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%