2017
DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2017.1280572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout, Rainbow Trout, and Hybrids by Use of Field‐Based Phenotypic Characteristics

Abstract: Native and nonnative salmonids within the same genus sometimes hybridize, and the hybrids are often difficult to visually distinguish from parental species. We compared phenotypic delineations (based on several visual characteristics) and genotypic screening (using seven nuclear DNA loci) for 323 fish collected from an Idaho stream where Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout O. clarkii bouvieri were introgressed with Rainbow Trout O. mykiss to evaluate our ability to visually distinguish Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field identification of non-native species can complicate maintenance control efforts, especially when invading species hybridize with native taxa further convoluting identification (Meyer et al 2017a). If hybrids between introduced and native taxa are fertile, non-native genes can spread across the native species through introgressive hybridization (Allendorf et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Field identification of non-native species can complicate maintenance control efforts, especially when invading species hybridize with native taxa further convoluting identification (Meyer et al 2017a). If hybrids between introduced and native taxa are fertile, non-native genes can spread across the native species through introgressive hybridization (Allendorf et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The Lamar River watershed in Yellowstone National Park, depicting the general frequency of non-native and hybrid trout, reaches designated for estimating angler catch (named with black font, separated by dotted lines), and sampling sites where fish were collected for genotype-phenotype comparisons. Sample locations correspond with Table 1 RT had faint cutthroat slashes, as did nearly 90% of all CTX (Meyer et al 2017a). Therefore, if trout in the Lamar River had similar phenotype to genotype relationships, then regulations enacted in 2013 were protecting a majority of the fish the managers wished to remove.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, scales were systematically sampled from PIT‐tagged juvenile steelhead to determine the age composition of the emigrating cohort (Bettoli and Miranda 2001). Fish that expressed characteristics of resident maturation (e.g., high frequency of spots, milt excretion) or hybridization with Cutthroat Trout O. clarkii (e.g., partial or faded throat slash, distinct pattern of spots) were excluded from analyses (Kennedy et al 2009; Meyer et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, visual identification of Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout from hybrids is accurate (Meyer et al. ), particularly for individuals with Rainbow Trout admixture that exceeds 20% (Kovach et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%