2014
DOI: 10.3998/ark.5550190.p008.408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distortion/interaction analysis of the reactivities and selectivities of halo– and methoxy–substituted carbenes with alkenes

Abstract: Dedicated to Pierre Vogel, a great scientist and friend, on his 70 th birthday DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ark.5550190.p008.408 AbstractThe transition structures for the (2+1) cycloadditions of dichlorocarbene, chlorofluorocarbene, and difluorocarbene to cyclohexene, 1-hexene, ethylene, and α-chloroacrylonitrile were located using quantum mechanical methods (M06-2X). In addition, transition structures for the (2+1) cycloadditions of chloromethoxycarbene, fluoromethoxycarbene, and dimethoxycarbene to ethylen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding expressions were E 1 = ω­(isatin) + N (ene) and E 2 = ω­(ene) + N (isatin), respectively (shown in Table S2). The results of activation strain model (ASM) analysis on transition states in the carbonyl-ene reaction were shown in Table and Table S3, in which activation energy Δ E ⧧ of the transition state was decomposed into strain energy Δ E ⧧ strain and interaction energy Δ E ⧧ int (i.e., Δ E ⧧ = Δ E ⧧ strain + Δ E ⧧ int ). Unless specified, the Gibbs free energies corrected by both solvation and zero-point vibrational effects at the B3LYP-D3­(BJ)/6-311G­(d,p)­(SMD, CH 2 Cl 2 ) level were used in the discussions.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The corresponding expressions were E 1 = ω­(isatin) + N (ene) and E 2 = ω­(ene) + N (isatin), respectively (shown in Table S2). The results of activation strain model (ASM) analysis on transition states in the carbonyl-ene reaction were shown in Table and Table S3, in which activation energy Δ E ⧧ of the transition state was decomposed into strain energy Δ E ⧧ strain and interaction energy Δ E ⧧ int (i.e., Δ E ⧧ = Δ E ⧧ strain + Δ E ⧧ int ). Unless specified, the Gibbs free energies corrected by both solvation and zero-point vibrational effects at the B3LYP-D3­(BJ)/6-311G­(d,p)­(SMD, CH 2 Cl 2 ) level were used in the discussions.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The anion–cation type and its possible configurations have a great impact on the interaction energy and physicochemical properties of MILs. The interaction energy ( E int ) emanates from the combination of closed-shell repulsion, polarization effects, charge transfer, electrostatic interactions, and occupied and unoccupied orbital interactions as well as noncovalent interactions. , All energies have been corrected for the basis set superposition error (BSSE) by the Boys and Bernardi function counterpoise method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrophilic P k + and nucleophilic P k – Parr functions were obtained by calculating the corresponding radical ion Mulliken atomic spin density . The factors controlling the reactivity trends in O–H insertion process were elucidated using the activation strain model (ASM). In ASM analysis, the potential energy surface Δ E was decomposed into the two contributors along reaction coordination: strain or (distortion) Δ E strain and interaction Δ E int . Energy decomposition analysis (EDA) was used to probe the interaction Δ E int between the deformed reacting fragments, which was composed of electrostatic interaction (Δ V elstat ), Pauli repulsion (Δ V Pauli ), orbital interaction (Δ E oi ), and dispersion effect (Δ E disp ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%