2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distracting users as per their knowledge: Combining linked open data and word embeddings to enhance history learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This 1926 character-long text (hereafter denoted as T 0 ) is related to the Battle of Thermopylae among Greeks and Persians in 480 BC (Blanco et al, 2020). That is, the aim is to compose a corpus related to the Greco-Persian wars, starting from a brief text related to the second Persian invasion of Greece and specifically to the famous and inspiring Battle of Thermopylae.…”
Section: Strategy and Sources Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This 1926 character-long text (hereafter denoted as T 0 ) is related to the Battle of Thermopylae among Greeks and Persians in 480 BC (Blanco et al, 2020). That is, the aim is to compose a corpus related to the Greco-Persian wars, starting from a brief text related to the second Persian invasion of Greece and specifically to the famous and inspiring Battle of Thermopylae.…”
Section: Strategy and Sources Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning of word embeddings has gained momentum in many Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications, ranging from text document summarisation (Mohd et al, 2020), fake news detection (Faustini and Covões, 2017;Silva et al, 2020), and term similarity measure (Lastra et al, 2019;Gali et al, 2019) to sentiment classification (Rezaeinia et al, 2019;Giatsoglou et al, 2017;Park et al, 2021), edutainment (Blanco et al, 2020), Named Entity Recognition (Turian et al, 2010;Gutiérrez-Batista et al, 2018), classification tasks (Jung et al, 2022) and personalization systems (Valcarce et al, 2019), just to name a few. Most popular methods consider a large corpus of texts and represent each word with a real-valued dense vector, which captures its meaning assuming that words sharing common contexts in the input corpus are semantically related to each other (and consequently their respective word vectors are close in the vector space) (Mikolov et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make correspondence between two or more ontology associated with our knowledge representation system. In fact, some researchers use linked or open data for the representation of know-ledge based on the SPARQL language [14], whereas others use the ontological representation [15] as a solution to problems relating to knowledge mapping. Knowledge identification is achieved via the use of two types of methods, namely: non-supervised [14] and supervised Web methods processed by experts in the field [16].…”
Section: Ontological Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%