1994
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199401000-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distraction Osteogenesis in the Irradiated Canine Mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one case, the bone transport became infected and was later followed by an amputation. The resected limb had been irradiated post-operatively, and bone transport in irradiated bones is a controversial issue [7,10]; our experience does not support this procedure. Bone transport is a demanding procedure in which many problems may occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In one case, the bone transport became infected and was later followed by an amputation. The resected limb had been irradiated post-operatively, and bone transport in irradiated bones is a controversial issue [7,10]; our experience does not support this procedure. Bone transport is a demanding procedure in which many problems may occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This technique of skeletal regeneration generally involves four stages 1,2 : (1) creation of a full osteotomy or a corticotomy, (2) latency period or callus formation between two bone ends, (3) distraction period or bone formation by callus stretching, and (4) consolidation or new bone tissue maturation. Although distraction osteogenesis was first popularized by Ilizarov in the mid-20th century to correct long bone defects, 3,4 its application was extended to the distraction of the membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton by Snyder et al in 1973.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other animal studies have shown that the diameter of the regenerated bone is comparable to pre existing bone. Gantous et al [14] demonstrated that distraction osteogenesis was feasible even in previously radiated mandible. Annino et al successfully applied trifocal distraction to bridge the defect by moving two transport segments towards each other in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic materials generally retain the characteristics of a foreign body and fail to fully replace living tissues in appearance or function. Distraction osteogenesis has been proposed as an alternate method of reconstruction, through which mandibular defects could be replaced by new bone grown from the remaining mandible [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%