2002
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.30581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in the previously irradiated patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one case, the bone transport became infected and was later followed by an amputation. The resected limb had been irradiated post-operatively, and bone transport in irradiated bones is a controversial issue [7,10]; our experience does not support this procedure. Bone transport is a demanding procedure in which many problems may occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In one case, the bone transport became infected and was later followed by an amputation. The resected limb had been irradiated post-operatively, and bone transport in irradiated bones is a controversial issue [7,10]; our experience does not support this procedure. Bone transport is a demanding procedure in which many problems may occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This method is often incorrectly referred to as an MBT process. 37,82,83,86 In contrast, reconstruction of segmental bone defects of the mandibular body has been mainly accomplished by using unidirectional MBT devices, 19,42 whereas few devices have been designed to reconstruct the slightly curved lateral aspect of the mandibular body. 1,16 Examination of the literature reveals that no internal devices have been reported for the reconstruction of the mandibular symphysis, although several external MBT devices provide either bidirectional 26,31 or multidirectional reconstruction of this anatomical part.…”
Section: The Distraction Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspite of the proven success of the MBT technique, problems still persist, such as soft tissue dehiscence, occurrence of occlusal disturbances, bone transport segment losing orientation, premature consolidation, regenerate deficiency, docking site nonunion, and failing devices. 34 Although several mandibular distraction devices have failed, 13,32,[35][36][37] paradoxically, no studies have examined both device design and biomechanical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to delayed bone regeneration 6,19 , it has been shown that pressure created by the distraction force causes severe damage to the mandibular condylar cartilage if the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region has received even low doses of irradiation. Hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) does not seem to prevent the cartilagionous damage 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%