2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11146-022-09911-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distressed Property Sales: Differences and Similarities Across Types of Distress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is contrary to the sale of distressed properties by private treaty, which entails arms length negotiation and transaction using broker channels, some scholars have reported how distressed properties have been "efficiently" sold within a limited period of time through short sales (Allen et al, 2022;Daneshvary et al, 2011;Downs and Xu, 2015), with a corresponding reduction in the time-on-the market (TOM). In other situations of secured lending, distressed properties were sold pursuant to a foreclosure and acquisition by the lender (Allen et al, 2022;Clauretie and Daneshvary, 2011;Mallach, 2014), and with TOM that is inversely proportional to the selling price on one hand (Ajayi, 1997;Anglin et al, 2003;Bello and Olusola, 2018;Benefield et al, 2014;Taylor, 1999), and directly proportional to property market conditions on the other hand (Filippova and Fu, 2011). However, these distressed properties that have remained on the market for a long period of time prior to their actual sales date might signal an adverse impact on the efficiency of selling landed properties in that category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is contrary to the sale of distressed properties by private treaty, which entails arms length negotiation and transaction using broker channels, some scholars have reported how distressed properties have been "efficiently" sold within a limited period of time through short sales (Allen et al, 2022;Daneshvary et al, 2011;Downs and Xu, 2015), with a corresponding reduction in the time-on-the market (TOM). In other situations of secured lending, distressed properties were sold pursuant to a foreclosure and acquisition by the lender (Allen et al, 2022;Clauretie and Daneshvary, 2011;Mallach, 2014), and with TOM that is inversely proportional to the selling price on one hand (Ajayi, 1997;Anglin et al, 2003;Bello and Olusola, 2018;Benefield et al, 2014;Taylor, 1999), and directly proportional to property market conditions on the other hand (Filippova and Fu, 2011). However, these distressed properties that have remained on the market for a long period of time prior to their actual sales date might signal an adverse impact on the efficiency of selling landed properties in that category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distressed sale is likened to property asset liquidation such that the proceeds of the sale is used to settle outstanding liabilities arising from the primary transaction under which the encumbered property assets had been held (Brueggeman and Fisher, 2011). Among the rationale for the sale of distressed properties outlined by Brueggeman and Fisher (2011), the dominant trajectory arises from non-performing loans or other forms of secured lending for which property was given up as a collateral security (Allen et al, 2022;Brueggeman and Fisher, 2011;Chow et al, 2015;Daneshvary et al, 2011;Vandell and Riddiough, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Findings about whether distressed properties have shorter (Goodwin and Johnson, 2017; Terrence M Clauretie and Nasser Daneshvary, 2011) or longer time on the market (as claimed by (Allen et al, 2022)), are inconclusive. Differences in liquidity in the market where a foreclosure occurs may inŕuence these different results; also, differences in the time on the market are relevant to the size of the foreclosure discount (T M Clauretie and Daneshvary, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%