2012
DOI: 10.5039/agraria.v7i4a1783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribuição espacial da rugosidade do solo em microparcelas experimentais sob diferentes intensidades de chuva simulada

Abstract: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a distribuição espacial da rugosidade do solo em microparcelas compostas por diferentes solos de Galícia (Espanha) após aplicação de distintas chuvas simuladas. Os agregados do solo, de 3-5 cm, foram coletados nos municípios de Lugo e Taboada. Em laboratório as parcelas experimentais foram construídas utilizando-se base metálica móvel de 0,86 m x 0,86 m (0,73 m 2). A rugosidade do solo (dm) foi determinada com rugosímetro laser, antes e depois da aplicação de quantidades c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Different elements of the soil, as well as preparation marks and even patterns of relief, contribute, in varying scales, to soil roughness (García Moreno, 2008), which is related to soil intrinsic factors, such as intensity and type of preparation, humidity prior to preparation, amount and type of plant residue, type of soil, and terrain declivity (Siqueira et al, 2012). The two main forms of surface roughness are: roughness at random and soil surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different elements of the soil, as well as preparation marks and even patterns of relief, contribute, in varying scales, to soil roughness (García Moreno, 2008), which is related to soil intrinsic factors, such as intensity and type of preparation, humidity prior to preparation, amount and type of plant residue, type of soil, and terrain declivity (Siqueira et al, 2012). The two main forms of surface roughness are: roughness at random and soil surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best fitted models were spherical and exponential. The identification of semivariogram models leads to the function of semivariance, through the distances between the sampling points (SIQUEIRA et al, 2012). RC(b) 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.60 0.33 0.9 Int According to the classification of Cambardella et al (1994), in the vegetation area in the 0.00-0.20 m layer the attributes pH (H 2 O), OM and SPR showed strong spatial variability and for the same area in the 0.20-0.40 m layer, only Mg 2+ and SPR did; the spatial variability for other attributes in the two layers was classified as moderate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide diversity of the results of studies on spatial variability of soil physical attributes is partly associated with the management system adopted (SIQUEIRA et al, 2012;CARLESSO et al, 2019). Thus, studying the spatial variability of soil penetration resistance on the soil surface favors the understanding of how the management adopted in pasture areas affects the soil and, from this, of which techniques should be adopted for the best yield of pastures (MATIAS et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A grande maioria dos dados apresentou razão de dependência espacial mediano-alta, não havendo um padrão específico entre os tratamentos com vista à ocorrência de maior ou menor valor de razão de dependência espacial. Este fato descreve como os diferentes sistemas de manejo atuam sobre a variabilidade natural dos atributos do solo (Siqueira et al, 2008: Siqueira et al, 2012.…”
Section: Tratamentounclassified