2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6859084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed allocation of mobile sensing agents in geophysical flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by Forgoston et al's work where they showed that LCS coincide with regions in the flow field where more escape events occur [1]. As such, knowledge of LCS is important for planning energy efficient trajectories in the ocean, maintaining sensors in their desired monitoring regions [13,9,6], and enabling computationally tractable and efficient estimation and prediction of the underlying geophysical fluid dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is supported by Forgoston et al's work where they showed that LCS coincide with regions in the flow field where more escape events occur [1]. As such, knowledge of LCS is important for planning energy efficient trajectories in the ocean, maintaining sensors in their desired monitoring regions [13,9,6], and enabling computationally tractable and efficient estimation and prediction of the underlying geophysical fluid dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For the latter, sensors can act as mobile agents which can move around for better sensing performance. Assuming each mobile agent has a map of the natural fluidic environment, [28] raised a distributed control policies enabling a homogeneous team of mobile sensing agents to maintain a desired spatial distribution. Reference [29] discusses coordinating a mobile sensor team, which can dynamically change their positions to optimize their coverage of the target.…”
Section: A Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], two new patrol algorithms are introduced to plan the paths of controllable floating cars to participate in traffic monitoring. Reference [29] is a study of a more general case, while the control strategy in [28] is derived from the Lagrangian coherent structures of the flow, and the patrol algorithm in [30] is closely related to the characteristics of the data reconstruction scheme. It goes without saying that there is a lot of work to do about control strategy in new environments.…”
Section: A Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a simulation of the dispersion of particulates in a time-varying wind-driven double-gyre flow where the LCS boundaries are marked as red curves and the corresponding velocity field is shown in Figure 2 . Figure 1 suggests that (a) Lagrangian Coherent Structure (LCS) boundaries behave as basin boundaries, and thus fluid from opposing sides of the boundary do not mix; (b) in the presence of noise 1 , particles can cross the LCS boundaries, and thus LCS denote regions in the flow field where more escape events occur (Forgoston et al, 2011 ); and (c) it makes sense to decompose the oceanic workspace along LCS boundaries and assign sensors to each LCS-bounded region for large-scale monitoring operations (Hsieh et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…boundaries and assign sensors to each LCS-bounded region for large-scale monitoring operations (Hsieh et al, 2014). While the model shown in Figures 1, 2 presents an idealized representation of the flow field, a snapshot of the ocean surface currents in August 2005 (Figure 3) shows a variety of flow patterns including jets and gyres similar to those in Figures 1, 2 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%