2011
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2011.2132809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Approach for Power and Rate Allocation to Secondary Users in Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water filling algorithm showed a comparable complexity to the proposed algorithm, while the proposed algorithm is more efficient than water filling and uniform loading algorithms specially in low interference threshold or high power budget due to the fact that in these states the proposed algorithm can be allocated more power to each subcarrier while satisfy the constraints in Eqs. (8) and (9). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The water filling algorithm showed a comparable complexity to the proposed algorithm, while the proposed algorithm is more efficient than water filling and uniform loading algorithms specially in low interference threshold or high power budget due to the fact that in these states the proposed algorithm can be allocated more power to each subcarrier while satisfy the constraints in Eqs. (8) and (9). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) and (9). In the optimal algorithm, all the L + 1 constraint was considered simultaneously, while in the proposed suboptimal algorithm only one constraint is kept and the transmission power in each subcarrier is determined.…”
Section: Suboptimal Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier works have concentrated on bi-objective models. They minimize the power and delay [ 7 ] or minimize the power and maximize the transmission rate [ 1 , 8 , 9 ], but not all of them simultaneously. The authors in [ 1 , 9 ] design a QoS-constrained bi-objective optimization model in order to minimize transmission power and maximize rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, effective rate allocation will also help to minimize end-to-end delay and control message overhead. Various rate allocation methods have been developed for CR networks from different perspectives, including end-to-end delay optimization [17], QoSconstrained bi-objective optimization [18], joint rate and power allocation [19], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%