1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(96)00150-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed approximating functional approach to fitting and predicting potential surfaces. 1. Atom-atom potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitting procedures that are not physically motivated have the virtue of simplicity. The most popular procedures of this type are spline, interpolating moving least squares (IMLS), , reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), , modified Sheppard interpolation (MSI), distributed approximating functionals (DAF), and neural network (NN) algorithms. These approaches are systematically improvable, work well even if coupling is large, and they are easy to use; e.g., most parameter values are completely determined by the numerical algorithm and do not need to be estimated on the basis of experimental results or intuition. However, in all of these methods, there are parameters that must be chosen by the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fitting procedures that are not physically motivated have the virtue of simplicity. The most popular procedures of this type are spline, interpolating moving least squares (IMLS), , reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), , modified Sheppard interpolation (MSI), distributed approximating functionals (DAF), and neural network (NN) algorithms. These approaches are systematically improvable, work well even if coupling is large, and they are easy to use; e.g., most parameter values are completely determined by the numerical algorithm and do not need to be estimated on the basis of experimental results or intuition. However, in all of these methods, there are parameters that must be chosen by the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popular Taylor-expansion based MSI method requires potential derivatives and is used almost exclusively with second-order expansions, as higher derivatives are difficult to obtain from ab initio calculations. The RKHS method is easiest to use with tensor product grids ,, which make it difficult to fit surfaces for systems with more than three atoms. ,, With a trajectory-based point selection scheme, the MSI approach can fit dynamically relevant parts of PESs of four-atom molecules , and some five- and six-atom systems. For the cited four-atom systems, the potential fitting errors of these methods are of the order of 10 1 −10 2 cm -1 . Similar errors are obtained with physically motivated fitting functions. ,, Recently, permutation invariant polynomials and interatomic distances have been used to fit several potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, standard interpolation methods (such as splines or orthogonal polynomial methods) are difficult to apply to systems with more than a few degrees of freedom. In recent years, a number of techniques have been developed to address this problem, and substantial progress has been made. Nevertheless, more work is needed to develop an accurate, efficient method that can be routinely applied to reacting systems with many degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%