2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2020.2979889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Bilayered Control for Transient Frequency Safety and System Stability in Power Grids

Abstract: This paper considers power networks governed by swing nonlinear dynamics and subject to disturbances. We develop a bilayered control strategy for a subset of buses that simultaneously guarantees transient frequency safety of each individual bus and asymptotic stability of the entire network. The bottom layer is a model predictive controller that, based on periodically sampled system information, optimizes control resources to have transient frequency evolve close to a safe desired interval. The top layer is a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelpredictive control [15] remains one of the most commonly used methods for enforcing dynamic constraints over some prediction horizon. However, it suffers from certain limitations in the context of power system dynamics, related to, for example, nonlinearity and associated complexity of the dynamics, information disparity due to communication overheads and/or privacy concerns, and computational burden, especially for longer prediction horizon [13]. To circumvent these issues, distributed safety verification and control methods based on robust forward set-invariance principles have been proposed in [11]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelpredictive control [15] remains one of the most commonly used methods for enforcing dynamic constraints over some prediction horizon. However, it suffers from certain limitations in the context of power system dynamics, related to, for example, nonlinearity and associated complexity of the dynamics, information disparity due to communication overheads and/or privacy concerns, and computational burden, especially for longer prediction horizon [13]. To circumvent these issues, distributed safety verification and control methods based on robust forward set-invariance principles have been proposed in [11]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%