2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed BOLD and CBV-weighted resting-state networks in the mouse brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
270
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
34
270
0
Order By: Relevance
“…supplementary, barrel field, and visual, and areas proposed to contribute to the "rodent default-mode network" ("DMN"), namely prefrontal and cingulate cortices (Gozzi and Schwarz, 2016;Sforazzini et al, 2014;Stafford et al, 2014). The present findings were robust and reproducible, as evidenced by the similar and significant CPS effects on network strengths obtained in each run, comprising 12-15 mice per CPS and control group per run, and with similar variances observed in the CPS and control data sets.…”
Section: Increases In Within-and Between-network Functional Connectivsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…supplementary, barrel field, and visual, and areas proposed to contribute to the "rodent default-mode network" ("DMN"), namely prefrontal and cingulate cortices (Gozzi and Schwarz, 2016;Sforazzini et al, 2014;Stafford et al, 2014). The present findings were robust and reproducible, as evidenced by the similar and significant CPS effects on network strengths obtained in each run, comprising 12-15 mice per CPS and control group per run, and with similar variances observed in the CPS and control data sets.…”
Section: Increases In Within-and Between-network Functional Connectivsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…24,25 Cortico-hippocampal connectivity was mapped with respect to a bilateral seed region placed in ventral hippocampus (subiculum), a key component of a distributed fronto-hippocampal network that appears to be conserved in rodents and humans. 30,51 The connectivity profile of the hippocampus in control mice highlighted the involvement of frontal and cingulate cortices (Figure 4a), in agreement with previous reports. 30,33,51 Interestingly, although the strength of hippocampal-frontal connectivity was similar in the two genotypes, the connectional profile of this region in Ddo − / − mice appeared to exhibit a wider and stronger involvement of peri-hippocampal and parietal somatosensory areas (P o 0.01, Student's t-test; Figures 4b and c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…30,51 The connectivity profile of the hippocampus in control mice highlighted the involvement of frontal and cingulate cortices (Figure 4a), in agreement with previous reports. 30,33,51 Interestingly, although the strength of hippocampal-frontal connectivity was similar in the two genotypes, the connectional profile of this region in Ddo − / − mice appeared to exhibit a wider and stronger involvement of peri-hippocampal and parietal somatosensory areas (P o 0.01, Student's t-test; Figures 4b and c). We detected no significant confounding effect of genotype on depth of anesthesia during fMRI as assessed by the amplitude of cortical BOLD signal fluctuation, 33,52 which was comparable in the two genotypes (62.9 ± 2.9 and 65.4 ± 2.9, respectively, P = 0.49, Student's t-test).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations