2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29049-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed compact plasma reactor decontamination for planetary protection in space missions

Abstract: This paper presents a proof-of-concept study establishing effectiveness of the Active Plasma Sterilizer (APS) for decontamination in planetary protection. The APS uses Compact Portable Plasma Reactors (CPPRs) to produce surface dielectric barrier discharge, a type of cold plasma, using ambient air to generate and distribute reactive species like ozone used for decontamination. Decontamination tests were performed with pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis) on materials (Aluminum, Polycarb… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CPPR is based on cold plasma generated ozone, an alternative decontamination technology, that works under ambient conditions. Previous studies on CPPR have shown its effectiveness against various types of bacteria ( Choudhury et al, 2018 ; Roy et al, 2021 ; Choudhury et al, 2023 ). The SARS-COV-2 inactivation results presented in this paper, along with previously published literature on CPPR and ozone ( Kogelschatz, 2003 ; Park et al, 2006 ; Choudhury et al, 2018 ; Roy et al, 2021 ; Choudhury et al, 2023 ), establishes the potential of CPPR as a decontamination technology for preventing HAIs (hospital acquired infections), further spread of COVID-19 and possible future outbreaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CPPR is based on cold plasma generated ozone, an alternative decontamination technology, that works under ambient conditions. Previous studies on CPPR have shown its effectiveness against various types of bacteria ( Choudhury et al, 2018 ; Roy et al, 2021 ; Choudhury et al, 2023 ). The SARS-COV-2 inactivation results presented in this paper, along with previously published literature on CPPR and ozone ( Kogelschatz, 2003 ; Park et al, 2006 ; Choudhury et al, 2018 ; Roy et al, 2021 ; Choudhury et al, 2023 ), establishes the potential of CPPR as a decontamination technology for preventing HAIs (hospital acquired infections), further spread of COVID-19 and possible future outbreaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have established the effectiveness of CPPR against bacterial and fungal species including Escherichia coli , Bacillus subtilis , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Enterobacter sp., Chrysobacter sp., Aspergillus sp., Xanthomonas sp., Chromobacter sp., Fusarium sp. and Enterobacter sp., and Staphylococcus aureus ( Choudhury et al, 2018 ; Roy et al, 2021 ; Choudhury et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual toxic and/or carcinogenic chemicals may endanger patients, sterilization operators, and medical professionals. Recently, plasma sterilization methods have been studied owing to potential for low toxicity and reduced sterilization times 2 6 . Although many plasma sterilization methods been applied to plastic tubing, effective sterilization methods have yet to be developed because of heat and damage caused to the tubing material 7 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the nitrogen oxides generated in the discharge were the main species contributing to the sterilization process. Portugal et al [16] and Choudhury et al [17,18] studied the ozone flow generated by the fan-shaped SDBD reactor. They found that the fan-shaped electrode improves ozone distribution and the decontamination process compared to the traditional comb-shaped design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%