2010
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2010.06.090890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed consensus-based demodulation: algorithms and error analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before proceeding, we deal with the approximation of E q j→k H H k,j . Then we have Now, we return to the approximation of x Putting the above relations (31), (33), (34), (37) and (38) together, we get AMP-RZFBF.…”
Section: Appendix A: Derivation For Amp-rzfbfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before proceeding, we deal with the approximation of E q j→k H H k,j . Then we have Now, we return to the approximation of x Putting the above relations (31), (33), (34), (37) and (38) together, we get AMP-RZFBF.…”
Section: Appendix A: Derivation For Amp-rzfbfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of ADMM to the concerned beamforming problem can be found in [34] (or [33,Section 8.3]). However, it is known that ADMM can be very slow to converge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we presented an distributed, iterative algorithm [1] that achieves this goal and establishes a consensus, i.e., that eventually, the centralized solution is available at all nodes. Compared to other algorithms from literature for consensusbased distributed estimation (e.g., [2], [3], [4]), our approach exhibits the advantage that every communication of nodes with its neighbors can be realized in a broadcast fashion only, resulting in relatively low communication effort, while still showing fast convergence. In this paper, we will investigate the algorithm's behavior in the presence of different classes of erroneous inter-node links; with additive errors as well as link failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm establishes a scheme where nodes in a network exchange information with each other in order to reach the centralized solution iteratively. Other distributed consensusbased algorithms were proposed, e.g., in [4], [5]. Compared to [4], the DiCE algorithm showed a faster convergence and higher robustness against link failures while keeping the same estimation performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigations of the DiCE algorithm concerning erroneous inter-node links were discussed in [7]. Both [4] and [7] describe the necessity of exchanging quantities in a unicast fashion between the nodes. Obviously, this exchange causes a high communication overhead in the network since each quantity depends on the transmitting and receiving node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%