"Second International Workshop on Remote Analysis and Measurement of Software Systems (RAMSS 04)" - W15S Workshop - 26th Intern 2004
DOI: 10.1049/ic:20040350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed expectation-driven residual testing

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of testing is motivated by the fact that software products are typically released with less than 100% coverage, so testers assume that any potential defects in the untested code (the residue) occur so rarely so as not to bear consideration. Much of the research in this area to date has focused on measuring the coverage provided by this approach by looking at untested residue [38] [43] or by comparing the coverage to specifications [37]. However, this work does not consider the actual execution of tests in the deployment environment, as we describe here.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of testing is motivated by the fact that software products are typically released with less than 100% coverage, so testers assume that any potential defects in the untested code (the residue) occur so rarely so as not to bear consideration. Much of the research in this area to date has focused on measuring the coverage provided by this approach by looking at untested residue [38] [43] or by comparing the coverage to specifications [37]. However, this work does not consider the actual execution of tests in the deployment environment, as we describe here.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%