1995
DOI: 10.1049/el:19950981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed feedback Er 3+ -doped fibre laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…53 dc offsets using a piezo produce even worse results since the precision in displacement has to be significantly better than half of the fringe period desired ͑Ӷ250 nm in physical displacement which is beyond the limits of many systems to produce reliably and reproducibility, even when combined with advanced interferometric monitoring despite piezo manufacturer and commercial grating supplier claims͒. Postprocessing remains the most popular choice of commercial manufacturers of phase-shifted devices such as fiber DFB lasers, 54 since active monitoring allows precise adjustment without the interferometric precision that raises substantially the costs of gratings produced by alternative methods. Unfortunately, the additional complexity of understanding the impact on birefringence from a different fluence in the center compared to the rest of the grating 48 makes this inappropriate for this work.…”
Section: A Precision Phase-shifting Gratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 dc offsets using a piezo produce even worse results since the precision in displacement has to be significantly better than half of the fringe period desired ͑Ӷ250 nm in physical displacement which is beyond the limits of many systems to produce reliably and reproducibility, even when combined with advanced interferometric monitoring despite piezo manufacturer and commercial grating supplier claims͒. Postprocessing remains the most popular choice of commercial manufacturers of phase-shifted devices such as fiber DFB lasers, 54 since active monitoring allows precise adjustment without the interferometric precision that raises substantially the costs of gratings produced by alternative methods. Unfortunately, the additional complexity of understanding the impact on birefringence from a different fluence in the center compared to the rest of the grating 48 makes this inappropriate for this work.…”
Section: A Precision Phase-shifting Gratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is a weak singlet-triplet transition near 327 nm. Most UV writing uses wavelengths near the 242 nm absorption, [19][20][21] some work has been performed with 193-nm excimer lasers making use of the tail of the 180-nm absorption, 22,23 and a few experiments have been performed near 327 nm. 24 In Fig.…”
Section: Energy Levels and Transfer Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there were unpublished demonstrations of these lasers as well as reported structures that were unlikely to be DFB action, the first reported DFB fiber laser that was unambiguously a distributed-feedback structure, which also employed UV-postprocessing, was by Asseh et al 6 Since this development, the field of research in DFB fiber lasers has been extensive. [7][8][9] The phase-shifted DFB structure is usually an UVwritten Bragg grating with an induced phase shift at or near the center. For fiber-based DFB lasers the easiest method to introduce the phase shift is through a localized refractive index change arising from exposure to UV light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%