2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2020.2993253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Formation Control of Mobile Agents via Global Orientation Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the formation control of a network of multiple agents (UAVs, mobile robots, etc.) that are spatially distributed [26], [27], it is desirable to compute the formation matching in a distributed fashion over the multiagent network. Moreover, distributed algorithms would be favored in largescale GM (of, e.g., graphs of features in images or social networks of users), in which the intervertex relations might be insecure to share, since the agents only communicate some auxiliary variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in the formation control of a network of multiple agents (UAVs, mobile robots, etc.) that are spatially distributed [26], [27], it is desirable to compute the formation matching in a distributed fashion over the multiagent network. Moreover, distributed algorithms would be favored in largescale GM (of, e.g., graphs of features in images or social networks of users), in which the intervertex relations might be insecure to share, since the agents only communicate some auxiliary variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though many GM algorithms have been developed [1]- [11], the proposed algorithm in this work is the first optimization scheme to tackle the GM problem in a distributed way. 3) Third, the proposed distributed GM approach is secure to the extent that the physical agents' identities remain unknown to the user; in contrast, many existing works related to cyber-physical multiagent systems, for example, [22], [26]- [29], [31], and [32], often require knowledge of all agents' indices in their designed algorithms. Furthermore, our proposed method is applicable for various cyber-physical networks, including formations of mobile robots or UAVs [26], [27], [31]; physicaldigital twin [28], [29]; and smart grids and multilayer networks [22], [32], as we have explained above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) For the formation stabilization control law, only local velocity and direction measurements are needed. Compared to the stabilization of double-integrator formations using relative position measurements [21], [22], no distance measurements are required in our formation stabilization control law. For the formation maneuvering law, in addition to the measurements mentioned in the stabilization case, we require only one agent, to measure its relative position with respect to a reference agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, decentralized control should be applied to nonholonomic systems having constraints in movement, such as vehicles. Notably, several studies have been reported wherein a decentralized control is initially developed for nonholonomic systems, or an algorithm for a holonomic system-based control law is extended by limiting certain conditions [5]- [12]. However, existing studies on holonomic systems cannot be directly applied to nonholonomic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%