2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/801/1/012003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Multi Robot Simultaneous Localization and Mapping with Consensus Particle Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computation of , is shown on equation (27 However, the calculations that are given in equations (28) to (31) require rearrangement of the particle index owned by robot and ′. The set of particles of both robot and ′ are sorted based on their local significant index.…”
Section: F Consensus-based Calculation Of Particles Weight In Distrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computation of , is shown on equation (27 However, the calculations that are given in equations (28) to (31) require rearrangement of the particle index owned by robot and ′. The set of particles of both robot and ′ are sorted based on their local significant index.…”
Section: F Consensus-based Calculation Of Particles Weight In Distrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important challenge in cooperation SLAM is how to stitch the maps from multiple tasks or multiple robots together by determining the relative positioning between multiple mapping results [22,23]; because SLAM is a relative positioning process, the coordinate system of the mapping result is usually determined by the first frame of data. There have been many studies on estimating the relative position, such as by seeking overlap of the local map [24,25], adding special sensors which can make each robot see the others [22,26], and cooperative localization methods [27][28][29]. Although these methods can achieve distributed indoor mapping, they depend on accurate matching algorithms to determine the relative positioning, which requires adjacent areas to have sufficient overlap, reduces mapping efficiency, and increases hardware costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%