1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61157-6_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed negotiation-based task planning for a flexible manufacturing environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, (Fox and al., 2000) have defined a coordination system using conversation structures while introducing a communication language (COOL) which is based on KQML i language and finite states automats. Other works have modeled only part of the supply chain (Hahndel and al., 1994) which uses a negotiation protocol to coordinate activities of the production planning. To date, few works focus on the use of coalition formation techniques to model coordination in supply chains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, (Fox and al., 2000) have defined a coordination system using conversation structures while introducing a communication language (COOL) which is based on KQML i language and finite states automats. Other works have modeled only part of the supply chain (Hahndel and al., 1994) which uses a negotiation protocol to coordinate activities of the production planning. To date, few works focus on the use of coalition formation techniques to model coordination in supply chains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an inherent distribution of resources such as knowledge and capability among the agents, an agent in a distributed planning system is unable to accomplish its own tasks alone, or at least can accomplish its tasks better when working with others (Durfee, 2001). Distributed planning is still an open challenge, and there is an increasingly number of applications that can benefit from this research area: cooperative robotics (Wehowsky et al, 2005) (Sirin et al, 2004), composition of semantic web services (Wu et al, 2003), manufacturing systems (Hahndel et al, 1996), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por una parte, los sistemas que son fuertemente centralizados y jerárquicos, representan un cuello de botella, el que hace difícil una reacción con la flexibilidad deseada, para las diversas fallas que ocurren al mismo tiempo y en condiciones de tiempo real (Hahndel et al 1996). Los enfoques centralizados pueden ser adecuados dentro de un dominio de planificación local, sin embargo se consideran insuficientes para cubrir situaciones más complejas y realistas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified