2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed neotectonic deformation in the Anatolides of Turkey: A palaeomagnetic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…East-west disorientations in the deep-sourced aeromagnetic anomalies of the Cappadocian region are determined at 30°in the counter clockwise direction in central Anatolia which is consistent with the mobilistic system (Storetvedt 2003). The mobilistic theory was also supported with the palaeomagnetic data (Gursoy et al 1997(Gursoy et al , 1998Piper et al 2010) andGPS measurements (McClusky et al 2000). Bilim and Ates (2007) investigated the effect of remanent magnetization and the rotations of geologic causative bodies in the northern central Anatolia with the application of a new method developed by them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…East-west disorientations in the deep-sourced aeromagnetic anomalies of the Cappadocian region are determined at 30°in the counter clockwise direction in central Anatolia which is consistent with the mobilistic system (Storetvedt 2003). The mobilistic theory was also supported with the palaeomagnetic data (Gursoy et al 1997(Gursoy et al , 1998Piper et al 2010) andGPS measurements (McClusky et al 2000). Bilim and Ates (2007) investigated the effect of remanent magnetization and the rotations of geologic causative bodies in the northern central Anatolia with the application of a new method developed by them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Such a larger-scale trigger might be found in a temporary increase of compressive stresses within the Anatolian plate, whose westward motion is resisted by the GreeceBalkan domain. This resistance induced firstly anticlockwise rotation of western Anatolia toward SW (Sengör and Yilmaz, 1981), probably in the last 2-3 My according to palaeomagnetic data (Piper et al, 2010), and possibly led to extension between a number of blocks behaving as broken slats in the intervening area (Taymaz et al, 1991;Yaltırak et al, 2012). Then, plate convergence caused the Eratosthenes seamount, rising more than 1 km above the oceanic crust of eastern Mediterranean, to collide with the Cyprus arc in the late Early Pleistocene, temporarily interrupting subduction and triggering compression of the Anatolian plate (Schattner, 2010).…”
Section: Geodynamic Meaning Of a Biga Peninsula Uplift Around 08 Mamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The specific character of this episode results from the propagation of the NAFZ at the western tip of the Anatolian plate affected by complex block rotations (Piper et al, 2010;Yilmaz et al, 2010), and from the resulting interactions with the Aegean N-S extensional regime, whose persisting influence is underlined by the development of E-trending grabens (Gürer et al, 2006). Moreover, uplift persisted then under changing stress regimes, and namely through the early-to-mid Pleistocene tectonic transition noted by Schattner (2010) in the whole eastern Mediterranean realm and characterized in Anatolia and the Aegean Sea by a short-lived compressional phase around 1 Ma followed by renewed extension in a slightly changed direction.…”
Section: Neogene Geodynamic Evolution Of the Biga Peninsulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the central part of the NAFZ fault deformation has a standard component, because the fault is parallel to the Black Sea coastline. Additionally, geological evidence indicates compressive strain near the Ilgaz Mountains (Piper et al, 2010). The main offsets on the NAFZ are in the Pontide suture which is located close to the city of Erzincan (longitude E39•20') (Sengor et al, 1985), around the Sea of Marmara (Armijo et al, 1999), and in the western part of the central bend (HubertFerrari et al, 2002).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%