Ieee Infocom 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2009.5062275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Non-Autonomous Power Control through Distributed Convex Optimization

Abstract: We consider the uplink power control problem where mobile users in different cells are communicating with their base stations. We formulate the power control problem as the minimization of a sum of convex functions. Each component function depends on the channel coefficients from all the mobile users to a specific base station and is assumed to be known only to that base station (only CSIR). We then view the power control problem as a distributed optimization problem that is to be solved by the base stations a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will keep our discussion brief and refer the readers to [12] for a general discussion on the power allocation problem. We will be using the formulation discussed in [30]. There are m mobile users (MU) in neighboring cells communicating with their respective base stations (BS) using a common wireless channel.…”
Section: Uplink Power Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will keep our discussion brief and refer the readers to [12] for a general discussion on the power allocation problem. We will be using the formulation discussed in [30]. There are m mobile users (MU) in neighboring cells communicating with their respective base stations (BS) using a common wireless channel.…”
Section: Uplink Power Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since each f p is a strictly convex function, both the Hessian matrix H k and its inverse H −1 k are positive definite and block-diagonal for all k. In addition, the matrix A has full row rank as shown in (13). Therefore, the product AH −1 k A is real and symmetric.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method makes some improvements in convergence rate over distributed subgradient methods. Compared with conventional centralized methods, the distributed methods have faster computing efficiency and have been widely used in many fields, such as image processing [9,10], computer vision [11], intelligent power grids [12,13], machine learning [14,15], unrelated parallel machine scheduling problems [16], model predictive control (MPC) problems [17], and resource allocation problems in multi-agent communication networks [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the algorithm as given in (9)-(10). Then, using the notation in (14) and utilizing the non-expansiveness property of the projection operator [10], Proposition 2.2.1, page 88, we have for any z * ∈ X * × {η * }, any k ≥ 0 and i ∈ V ,…”
Section: Analysis Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the space limitation we will keep our discussion brief and refer the readers to [13] for a general discussion on the power allocation problem. We will be using the formulation discussed in [14]. There are m mobile users (MU) in neighboring cells communicating with their respective base stations (BS) using a common wireless channel.…”
Section: Example: Uplink Power Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%