2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3082537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Primal-Dual Perturbation Algorithm Over Unbalanced Directed Networks

Abstract: Date of publication xxxx **, ****, date of current version xxxx **, ****.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Proposition 1 states that the convergence rate of the estimated primal solution to the optimal solution is sublinear. This shows that, despite the less local communication between service providers, the proposed event‐driven distributed algorithm can achieve comparable convergence performance to the existing time‐driven algorithms [20–27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, Proposition 1 states that the convergence rate of the estimated primal solution to the optimal solution is sublinear. This shows that, despite the less local communication between service providers, the proposed event‐driven distributed algorithm can achieve comparable convergence performance to the existing time‐driven algorithms [20–27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An approach to resolve the scalability issue is to use a distributed optimization algorithm for multi-agent systems, which has been gaining significant attention [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, conventional distributed optimization methods require communication between service providers at each algorithm iteration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to Theorem 1, we give the decoupling decomposition of ( 29) in following theorem. Theorem 3: For the optimization problem (29), if there is a local cost function J i (y, α u , β v , σ) for every i ∈ N and for then G = {N , {Y i }, {J i }} is a potential game, and ( 29) can be decoupled into n sub-optimization problems…”
Section: A Decoupling Design Under Penalty Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the proposed method is based on the row stochastic property of the weight matrix. Because algorithms with row stochasticity can be implemented with the information received from inneighbor agents [41,42], the proposed method has an advantage in distributed settings compared with push-sum-based methods. Although the dual averaging algorithm in [40] does not require column stochasticity, a coupling inequality constraint is not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%