Distributed processing for action control by prelimbic circuits targeting anterior-posterior dorsal striatal subregions

Abstract

Fronto-striatal circuits have been extensively implicated in the cognitive control of behavioral output for both social and appetitive rewards. The functional diversity of prefrontal cortical populations is strongly dependent on their synaptic targets, with control of motor output strongly mediated by connectivity to the dorsal striatum. Despite evidence for functional diversity along the anterior-posterior axis of the dorsomedial striatum (DMS), it is unclear how distinct fronto- striatal sub-circuits support neural computations essential for action selection. Here we identify prefrontal populations targeting distinct DMS subregions and characterize their functional roles. We first performed neural circuit tracing to reveal segregated prefrontal populations defined by anterior/posterior dorsomedial striatal target. We then probed the functional relevance of these parallel circuits via in vivo calcium imaging and temporally precise causal manipulations during a feedback-based 2-alternative choice task. Single-photon imaging revealed circuit-specific representations of task-relevant information with prelimbic neurons targeting anterior DMS (PL::A- DMS) uniquely encoded choices and responses to negative outcomes, while prelimbic neurons targeting posterior DMS (PL::P-DMS) encoded internal representations of value and positive outcomes contingent on prior choice. Consistent with this distributed coding, optogenetic inhibition of PL::A-DMS circuits strongly impacted choice monitoring and behavioral control in response to negative outcomes while perturbation of PL::P-DMS signals impaired task engagement and strategies following positive outcomes. Di-synaptic retrograde tracing uncovered differences in afferent connectivity that may underlie these pathways functional divergence. Together our data uncover novel PL populations engaged in distributed processing for action control.SUMMARYPrelimbic cortex engages A- and P-DMS via distinct circuitsPL::A-DMS and PL::P-DMS pathways encode divergent aspects of a simple goal-directed taskPL::A-DMS pathways shape responding to negative outcomes via multiple mechanismsPL::P-DMS pathways guide engagement and choices in response to positive outcomesAfferent connectomes of PL neurons defined by A-P DMS target are distinct

Dopamine Release Plateau and Outcome Signals in Dorsal Striatum Contrast with Classic Reinforcement Learning Formulations

“…Striatal dopamine release responses can be different in different striatal sectors, prominently so between the medial and lateral regions of the caudoputamen in mice 11,[21][22][23] . Such differences have been reported for other topographic dimensions as well 12,[24][25][26] . The dopamine release signals can be principally related to negative as well as positive reinforcement 5,[27][28][29] or to non-reward parameters of movement 21,30,31 , can occur as prolonged ramping signals 32 , and can be compartmentally selective for striosome and matrix compartments of the striatum 18,[33][34][35][36] .…”

A feature-specific prediction error model explains dopaminergic heterogeneity

“…While still quite stylized, this account represents a more realistic picture compared to the traditional scalar story of both value and RPE. Notably, it better reflects the known topography in the projections from cortical inputs to MSNs and from MSNs to dopamine units 44,45,49 , and physiological findings that both input populations show variable tuning to similar features as do the DA neurons 5, [61][62][63][64][65][66] . Incorporated in the feature-specific RPE model (even without specifying a particular feature basis), these properties directly imply several aspects of the heterogeneous dopamine response.…”

Stochastic characterization of navigation strategies in an automated variant of the Barnes maze

“…However, in our experimental paradigm, this behavior may have been promoted by the vestibule-reward association rather than anxiety. Finally, the random strategy might be related to exploratory behaviors and engage an ensemble of brain regions important for sensory integration, decision-making and reinforcement learning such as the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and basal ganglia 9,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] .…”