2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-011-9260-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed pursuit-evasion without mapping or global localization via local frontiers

Abstract: This paper addresses a visibility-based pursuit-evasion problem in which a team of mobile robots with limited sensing and communication capabilities must coordinate to detect any evaders in an unknown, multiply-connected planar environment. Our distributed algorithm to guarantee evader detection is built around maintaining complete coverage of the frontier between cleared and contaminated regions while expanding the cleared region. We detail a novel distributed method for storing and updating this frontier wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12 represents the plane spanned by the points p l , p m , p n . From the law of sines, it follows δ ln δ lm = sin(∆ ln ) sin(∆ lm ) , where sin(∆ ln ) = β mn × β ml and sin(∆ lm ) = β nl × β nm = l R n β nl × l R n β nm = = − β ln × l R m m R n β nm , thus proving (9). Finally, (10) follows from (8) , where the denominator p n − p m δ −1 lm = β ln γ lmn − β lm since β mn is a unit vector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 12 represents the plane spanned by the points p l , p m , p n . From the law of sines, it follows δ ln δ lm = sin(∆ ln ) sin(∆ lm ) , where sin(∆ ln ) = β mn × β ml and sin(∆ lm ) = β nl × β nm = l R n β nl × l R n β nm = = − β ln × l R m m R n β nm , thus proving (9). Finally, (10) follows from (8) , where the denominator p n − p m δ −1 lm = β ln γ lmn − β lm since β mn is a unit vector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This way, the controller is independent of the knowledge of the robot absolute positions in space and, thus, does not require presence of global localization systems such as GPS or SLAM algorithms (see, e.g., [9]). In the same spirit, A. Franchi, C. Masone, V. Grabe substantial research efforts have been devoted to the development of solutions based on standard, light-weight, lowenergy, and cheap sensors (like onboard cameras), rather than active and energetically-expensive sensing devices (like, e.g., laser/structured-light range-sensors) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, these can be usually obtained from direct onboard sensing, and are thus free from the presence of global localization modules such as GPS or simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithms (see, e.g., Durham et al, 2012), or other forms of centralized…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been selected only based on the expertise of the authors and are not intended to endorse any claim of generality or importance. Other examples include continuous monitoring of temporal-spatial phenomena in partially known environments (e.g., ocean monitoring [28]), olfactory exploration [22], tactile exploration of object properties [25], information gathering [27], and pursuit/evasion [13].…”
Section: Navigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%