2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18590-9_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Reachability Queries on Massive Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other Reachability Approaches: Besides approaches that use (partial) 2-hop labels, researchers also proposed other approaches that do not involve 2-hop labels, including [9], [12], [14]- [16], [18], [21]. These approaches assign each node u a label that maintains partial TC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other Reachability Approaches: Besides approaches that use (partial) 2-hop labels, researchers also proposed other approaches that do not involve 2-hop labels, including [9], [12], [14]- [16], [18], [21]. These approaches assign each node u a label that maintains partial TC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and A i (lines [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. At the same time, we generate their partitions D(i) and A(i), for which each subset is recorded in H D and H A , respectively.…”
Section: Partitions Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use n and m to denote the number of vertices and edges of the graph, respectively. Also, many indexing methods have been proposed based on the idea of compressing the TC [42,45], online search guided by precomputed indices [41,30,50,53,59], and labeling schemes [12,14,16,31,40,52]. The 2-hop approach cannot be directly modified to LCR queries as the classical one does not consider labels.…”
Section: Reachability Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem seems simple and fundamental but very challenging due to the increasing size of graph data. In recent years, many research efforts have been devoted to efficiently support reachability queries on large graphs (e.g., [12,14,16,31,40,52,41,30,50,53,59]). Most of these techniques only consider the structure information of the graph and all edges are involved in the reachability queries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Label+G approaches assign each node u a label L u that covers partial reachability information. The recent Label+G approaches include GRAIL [31], [32], Yes-GRAIL [33], FERRARI-G [34], FELINE [35], IP + [25] and BFL + [26]. Given a query u?…”
Section: ) Dag Traversalmentioning
confidence: 99%