2022
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2022.3178410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Real-Time Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yao et al [49] proposed a new mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model based on the improved disjunctive graph model, and verified its effectiveness in solving the job-shop scheduling problem of mobile robots through examples. Zhang et al [20] proposed a DRTS method based on deep reinforcement learning, which effectively solved the distributed real-time scheduling problem of job shop AGVs in cloud manufacturing mode. In general, this topic category revealed that under the guidance of lean logistics, production capacity and other constraints, Heuristic algorithm, machine learning, system dynamics, Witness, and other simulation modeling optimization methods are used to solve the problems of workshop production job scheduling, efficiency prediction, logistics AGV intelligent scheduling, combinatorial optimization logistics analysis, system layout design, and so on [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Analysis Of Bibliometric Results Of Production Logistics In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yao et al [49] proposed a new mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model based on the improved disjunctive graph model, and verified its effectiveness in solving the job-shop scheduling problem of mobile robots through examples. Zhang et al [20] proposed a DRTS method based on deep reinforcement learning, which effectively solved the distributed real-time scheduling problem of job shop AGVs in cloud manufacturing mode. In general, this topic category revealed that under the guidance of lean logistics, production capacity and other constraints, Heuristic algorithm, machine learning, system dynamics, Witness, and other simulation modeling optimization methods are used to solve the problems of workshop production job scheduling, efficiency prediction, logistics AGV intelligent scheduling, combinatorial optimization logistics analysis, system layout design, and so on [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Analysis Of Bibliometric Results Of Production Logistics In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many scholars conducted research in the direction of production logistics process optimization, production logistics systems, and enabling technology applications. In production logistics process optimization, existing research focused on production logistics process optimization theories (e.g., lean logistics, green logistics), simulation modeling methods (e.g., Petri nets, heuristic algorithms) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In terms of production logistics system research, existing studies focused on production equipment layout design, logistics scheduling, and process modeling (e.g., data flow diagram modeling, action diagram modeling) [14,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since for each SFP type the same processing time is given, a constant o 1 ensures equidistant time steps for the agent-environment interactions. Otherwise, a more sophisticated approach such as a so called Semi-MDP would be needed to cope with varying production amounts and therefore non-equidistant time steps [26] [27]. We define o 1 to be 50 based on domain expertise.…”
Section: ) Action Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CMfg has been around for several decades already, scheduling problems in CMfg have only gained significant interest in the last decade. The majority of published research in this area deals with dynamic scheduling problems using the multi-agent systems paradigm combined with artificial intelligence tools (Liu et al, 2019a;Rashidifar et al, 2022;Zhou et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2022c;Zhang et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2023). Two recent articles by Liu et al (2019a) and Rashidifar et al (2022) give a more complete review of this subject.…”
Section: Towards More Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%