2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed stabilization control of rigid formations with prescribed orientation

Abstract: Most rigid formation controllers reported in the literature aim to only stabilize a rigid formation shape, while the formation orientation is not controlled. This paper studies the problem of controlling rigid formations with prescribed orientations in both 2-D and 3-D spaces. The proposed controllers involve the commonly-used gradient descent control for shape stabilization, and an additional term to control the directions of certain relative position vectors associated with certain chosen agents. In this con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that control law (14) does not require additional measurements compared to (11). By defining a new state for the integral term, control law (14) can be rewritten aṡ…”
Section: ) Moving Leaders With Constant Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that control law (14) does not require additional measurements compared to (11). By defining a new state for the integral term, control law (14) can be rewritten aṡ…”
Section: ) Moving Leaders With Constant Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the scale or orientation of the formation is difficult to control using this approach because changing the scale or orientation requires changing the displacement constraints. As a comparison, distance-based control laws can be applied to track target formations with time-varying translations and orientations [13], [14], but it is difficult to track time-varying formation scales. Bearing-based control laws can track formations with time-varying translations and scales [9], [10], but it is difficult to track time-varying orientations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very often, such potential functions are defined by geometric quantities such as distances or areas related with agents' positions over an interaction graph in the configuration space. Typical scenarios involving gradientbased control in multi-agent coordination include distance-based formation control [5][6][7][8][9], multi-robotic maneuvering and manipulability control [10], motion coordination with constraints [11], among others. Comprehensive discussions and solutions to characterize distributed gradient control laws for multi-agent coordination control are provided in [3] and [12], which emphasize the notion of clique graph (i.e., complete subgraph) in designing potential functions and gradient-based controls.…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Center manifold theory was employed to obtain local asymptotic stability in the work of Krick et al A general case of controlling rigid formations was then discussed in the work of Oh and Ahn by directly controlling the Euclidean distance matrix of the given formation. The control of rigid formations was also discussed in n ‐dimensional spaces, with mismatched measurements and prescribed orientation . On the other hand, if the distance between i and j is only maintained by one of the two agents, the formation is then depicted by a directed graph, and the term persistence is introduced to describe such kind of formations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of rigid formations was also discussed in n-dimensional spaces, 10 with mismatched measurements 11 and prescribed orientation. 12 On the other hand, if the distance between i and j is only maintained by one of the two agents, the formation is then depicted by a directed graph, and the term persistence is introduced to describe such kind of formations. 13 In the works of Yu et al 14 and Summers et al, 15 the control of minimally persistent formation in a 2-dimensional (2D) space was discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%