2019 1st International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icoris.2019.8874898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Training for Multilingual Combined Tokenizer using Deep Learning Model and Simple Communication Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the experimental results in previous studies, the best performance of the Bi-LSTM proposed in this study provides the most significant increase of approximately 13% compared to other approaches that do not use Deep Learning. However, compared with the Bi-LSTM that has been proposed by [21], there was an increase of approximately 2%. The reason is that the results of the proposed approach are using two labels and while in [21] approach uses four labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the experimental results in previous studies, the best performance of the Bi-LSTM proposed in this study provides the most significant increase of approximately 13% compared to other approaches that do not use Deep Learning. However, compared with the Bi-LSTM that has been proposed by [21], there was an increase of approximately 2%. The reason is that the results of the proposed approach are using two labels and while in [21] approach uses four labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, compared with the Bi-LSTM that has been proposed by [21], there was an increase of approximately 2%. The reason is that the results of the proposed approach are using two labels and while in [21] approach uses four labels. The use of two labels can give the best results compared to 4 labels in previous studies, especially in sentence boundary detection research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations