2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2021.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution, abundance and spatial variability of microplastic pollution on the surface of Lake Superior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earn et al ranked the lakes from highest to lowest by average MP concentrations in round numbers, as follows: Lake St. Clair (355,000 particles/km 2 ), Lake Erie (162,000 particles/km 2 ), Lake Huron (111,000 particles/km 2 ), Lake Superior (35,000 particles/km 2 ), and Lake Michigan (17,000 particles/km 2 ). Cox et al published a study quantifying the concentration of MPs in Lake Superior surface water after Earn et al published their review, reporting about 30,000 particles/km 2 on average, 39 which is very similar to the average reported by Earn et al As noted, these estimates are from a relative handful of measurements considering the vast expanse of the Great Lakes, and reported concentrations range over multiple orders of magnitude. Earn et al illustrated the high variability across the limited set of samples for a single lake, as shown in Figure 1B.…”
Section: In the Great Lakessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Earn et al ranked the lakes from highest to lowest by average MP concentrations in round numbers, as follows: Lake St. Clair (355,000 particles/km 2 ), Lake Erie (162,000 particles/km 2 ), Lake Huron (111,000 particles/km 2 ), Lake Superior (35,000 particles/km 2 ), and Lake Michigan (17,000 particles/km 2 ). Cox et al published a study quantifying the concentration of MPs in Lake Superior surface water after Earn et al published their review, reporting about 30,000 particles/km 2 on average, 39 which is very similar to the average reported by Earn et al As noted, these estimates are from a relative handful of measurements considering the vast expanse of the Great Lakes, and reported concentrations range over multiple orders of magnitude. Earn et al illustrated the high variability across the limited set of samples for a single lake, as shown in Figure 1B.…”
Section: In the Great Lakessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In 2013, Eriksen et al reported an average microplastic concentration of 5397 ± 4547 particles km –2 at five locations in Eastern Lake Superior and an average concentration of 43 157 ± 115 519 particles km –2 for all 21 study locations throughout Lakes Superior, Huron, and Erie . In 2021, Cox et al reported an average microplastic concentration of 29 948 particles km –2 in the 0.5–4.75 mm size class for 187 sites in Lake Superior sampled by neuston net …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 particles km −2 in the 0.5−4.75 mm size class for 187 sites in Lake Superior sampled by neuston net. 19 Of the 129 manta net particles that were visually detected as microplastics via optical microscopy in this study, 25 were large enough to be extracted for ATR-FTIR analysis (Table S9). Of all polymer types detected by ATR-FTIR, the predominance of polyethylene (PE) (44%), polypropylene (PP) (20%), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (28%) (Figure S10 and Table S9) in Western Lake Superior is in agreement with the fact that the majority of plastic in production is PE, PP, and PET.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations