1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7836(94)00339-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and abundance of post-larvae and juveniles of the Patagonian sprat, Sprattus fuegensis, and related hydrographic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus breeding at Martillo Island feed exclusively on Fuegian Sprat Sprattus fuegensis in years of abundance, which was the case during the study period, while relying on other prey species when sprats are scarce (Schiavini et al 2005;Scioscia et al, unpublished data). Sprat distribution is thought to be related to water masses ranging between 9 and 12°C (Sanchez et al 1995), which could be confirmed by the temperature profile recorded during the trips in our study (between 8 and 9°C), while in poor sprat years the temperatures range between 6 and 7°C (Raya Rey unpublished data, breeding season 2007/2008). Furthermore, waters in the Beagle Channel were well mixed, evident from only little variation (\0.5°C) in the temperature depth profiles obtained (Antezana 1999; this study) Also, sprats seem to be concentrated in certain areas of the Beagle Channel, although bathymetry was not found to be a key feature explaining sprat distribution, which coincided with the previous knowledge from an acoustic survey (Casarsa 2005).…”
Section: Influence Of Tidal Activitysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus breeding at Martillo Island feed exclusively on Fuegian Sprat Sprattus fuegensis in years of abundance, which was the case during the study period, while relying on other prey species when sprats are scarce (Schiavini et al 2005;Scioscia et al, unpublished data). Sprat distribution is thought to be related to water masses ranging between 9 and 12°C (Sanchez et al 1995), which could be confirmed by the temperature profile recorded during the trips in our study (between 8 and 9°C), while in poor sprat years the temperatures range between 6 and 7°C (Raya Rey unpublished data, breeding season 2007/2008). Furthermore, waters in the Beagle Channel were well mixed, evident from only little variation (\0.5°C) in the temperature depth profiles obtained (Antezana 1999; this study) Also, sprats seem to be concentrated in certain areas of the Beagle Channel, although bathymetry was not found to be a key feature explaining sprat distribution, which coincided with the previous knowledge from an acoustic survey (Casarsa 2005).…”
Section: Influence Of Tidal Activitysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Falkland sprat forms dense schools in straits and channels along the Argentinean Patagonian coast (Sánchez et al 1995) and recently it has been identified south 41°S in the Pacific Ocean (Aranis et al 2007). It is a partial spawner whose reproductive activity tends to concentrate between September and October (Leal et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was an unidentified clupeid in the diet at Diego Ramirez in (Arata and Xavier, 2003, and a small unidentified fish at New Island in 1987 that made up 80% of the fish prey (Thompson, 1992), which may have been sprat. This species has a high biomass across the southern Patagonian shelf as far as the Magellan Strait (Sánchez et al, 1995), Chilean channel waters (Diez et al, 2012) and around the Falkland Islands (Agnew, 2002), and is common in the diet of other seabirds and The hierarchical clustering of albatross diet and fishery catch data by month, based on the proportion of sequences (RRA, black text) and proportion of catch (blue text). Clusters were based on dissimilarity indices calculated with the Manhattan method, and hierarchical clustering was constructed using the average agglomeration method (note low sample sizes during January 2014 and 2015).…”
Section: Fish Prey Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%