2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and characterization of microplastics in beach sand from three different Indian coastal environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
3
14

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
73
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In the particle size distribution of microplastics (Figure ), the proportion of microplastics with different particle size ranges in the three samples was in the order of 10 to 15 μm > 20 to 25 μm > 15 to 20 μm > 5 to 10 μm = 0 to 5 μm. With the increase in the particle size, the content of microplastics in the three samples first increased and then decreased, which is inconsistent with the results of most studies involving the increase of microplastic particle size . This may be because the microplastic particle size distribution in other studies is generally larger than 50 μm, while the particle size of microplastics in this study was smaller.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the particle size distribution of microplastics (Figure ), the proportion of microplastics with different particle size ranges in the three samples was in the order of 10 to 15 μm > 20 to 25 μm > 15 to 20 μm > 5 to 10 μm = 0 to 5 μm. With the increase in the particle size, the content of microplastics in the three samples first increased and then decreased, which is inconsistent with the results of most studies involving the increase of microplastic particle size . This may be because the microplastic particle size distribution in other studies is generally larger than 50 μm, while the particle size of microplastics in this study was smaller.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase in the particle size, the content of microplastics in the three samples first increased and then decreased, which is inconsistent with the results of most studies involving the increase of microplastic particle size. [32][33][34][35][36] This may be because the microplastic particle size distribution in other studies is generally larger than 50 μm, while the particle size of microplastics in this study was smaller. The results indicate that the plastic waste in the soil is under the external influence of high temperature oxidation, ultraviolet radiation, physical erosion, and so on.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Positive Ion Spectrum Obtained From Xa1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar range of concentrations (6870 ± 6140 items kg − 1 d.w.; min-max: 5014-8714 items kg − 1 d.w.) to our study (9238 ± 2097 items kg − 1 d.w.) was observed in beach sediments from the Beibu Gulf and the coast of the South China Sea (Qiu et al, 2015), located nearby human activities, despite that the range of MPs observation was broader than the one of our study (Table 2). In surface beach sediment from India, lower microplastic concentrations than in Da Nang were measured despite that the beaches were impacted by different anthropogenic activities like an urban area (Mumbai, 220 ± 50 items kg − 1 d.w.), port and industrial areas (Tuticorin, 181 ± 60 items kg − 1 d.w.), and tourism and fishing areas (Dhanushkodi, 45 ± 12 items kg − 1 d.w.) (Tiwari et al, 2019) or Canacona city (520 items kg − 1 d.w.; Balasubramaniam and Phillott, 2016). The MPs concentrations measured in other Asian beaches from Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Japan, and Dubai were also one order of magnitude lower than the ones in Da Nang, despite again that the range of MPs observation was broader than our (Balasubramaniam and Phillott, 2016;Nor and Obbard, 2014;Ng and observations were made in other beaches from other continents like in Argentina (46.0 ± 34.8 -Colin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comparison Of Microplastic Concentrations To Worldwide Beachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through decades of agricultural activities, a large number of MPs with smaller particle sizes have accumulated in the region. Plastic products in soil are easier to decompose into MPs with smaller particle size under the effects of agricultural activities, ultraviolet radiation, and microbial decomposition [37][38][39]. However, the MPs at XA2, XA3, XA4, and XA11 were mainly larger than 20 µm.…”
Section: Type Particle Size Abundance and Distribution Of Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%