2018
DOI: 10.2983/035.037.0514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and Condition of Intertidal Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) Reefs in Apalachicola Bay Florida Based on High-Resolution Satellite Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our oyster density results over time and space also show declines in oyster counts, with the largest declines occurring in inshore areas, which may be becoming more like offshore and nearshore regions based on counts ( Figure 6). What is not known is whether these inshore losses are offset by the formation of new reefs elsewhere, although this could possibly be assessed through satellite, drone-based, or other surveys (Grizzle et al 2018;Windle et al 2019). Seavey et al (2011) reported the inland colonization of a salt marsh by oysters in inshore areas of Suwannee Sound, but those increases did not offset net losses experienced in nearshore and offshore reefs.…”
Section: Trends In Oyster Populations In the Gulf Of Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our oyster density results over time and space also show declines in oyster counts, with the largest declines occurring in inshore areas, which may be becoming more like offshore and nearshore regions based on counts ( Figure 6). What is not known is whether these inshore losses are offset by the formation of new reefs elsewhere, although this could possibly be assessed through satellite, drone-based, or other surveys (Grizzle et al 2018;Windle et al 2019). Seavey et al (2011) reported the inland colonization of a salt marsh by oysters in inshore areas of Suwannee Sound, but those increases did not offset net losses experienced in nearshore and offshore reefs.…”
Section: Trends In Oyster Populations In the Gulf Of Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many species of oysters of the family Ostreidae are globally recognized as a critical estuarine component as they provide important ecosystem and fishery benefits (Gutiérrez et al 2003;Coen et al 2007;Carranza et al 2009;Grabowski et al 2012). Large declines in oyster populations have been observed at global (Beck et al 2011), continental (Zu Ermgassen et al 2012;Alleway and Connell 2015), regional (Seavey et al 2011;Wilberg et al 2011Wilberg et al , 2013, and local spatial scales (Pine et al 2015;Grizzle et al 2018). These losses have been widely documented, including localized extirpations in Australia (Alleway and Connell 2015) and large biomass reductions in the USA, particularly in the Chesapeake Bay and U.S. Gulf of Mexico regions, where the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica is highly valued from cultural, fishery, and ecosystem service perspectives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…American oysters are dioecious, oviparous species of substantial commercial value (Eckelbarger and Davis 1996). Their distribution occurs along the east and west coasts of the USA as well as the east coast of Central and Northern South America, and even some coasts of Europe (Grizzle 1990, Eckelbarger andDavis 1996;Grizzle et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, standard methods for studying intertidal reefs include quadrat sampling to quantify oyster densities (e.g., [18]), the use of GPS receivers to measure reef morphology in situ (e.g., [19]), and satellite imagery to quantify declines at a broader spatial scale (e.g., [20]). Satellite imagery is used as a cost-effective alternative to in situ sampling of intertidal reefs [20,21]; however, the coarse spatial resolution of data does not allow for analyses that are detailed enough for practical, fine-scale monitoring, management, and restoration efforts. Furthermore, satellite imagery does not always align with a favorable tidal stage in the area of interest, limiting what is discernible in the imagery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%